Pro/Forums - View Single Post

Les · 12-07-2004, 06:43 PM

Yes, the results seem to be a little enigmatic.
For a first look-see chose what appeared to be most problematic area - a low fannage curve.

At equilibrium
Radiator heat in = Radiator Heat Out
Wwi + dPwQw = Wa + Wwo
TwiCwQw + dPwQw = Wa + TwoCwQw,
Wa = (Twi-Two)CwQw + dPwQw

The imaginary + or - 0.02c error and/or the inclusion of frictional heat (dPwQw) in the heat dissipated seem to help a liitle..
An 0.02c offset error (represented by top and bottom of error bars), on its own , is no better.

12-07-2004, 06:43 PM	#36
Les Cooling Savant Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Wigan UK Posts: 929	Yes, the results seem to be a little enigmatic. For a first look-see chose what appeared to be most problematic area - a low fannage curve. At equilibrium Radiator heat in = Radiator Heat Out Wwi + dPwQw = Wa + Wwo TwiCwQw + dPwQw = Wa + TwoCwQw, Wa = (Twi-Two)CwQw + dPwQw The imaginary + or - 0.02c error and/or the inclusion of frictional heat (dPwQw) in the heat dissipated seem to help a liitle.. An 0.02c offset error (represented by top and bottom of error bars), on its own , is no better.