Pro/Forums - View Single Post

Cathar · 11-13-2004, 05:55 AM

I was able to re-use data that I had input from my simulator thing and wrote a custom perl script to munge it into a usable data set. I removed the rad + tubing effects. This is the graph that I arrived at. Re: the logarithmic thing - given Phaestus's data it would appear that since the flow rates don't go down low enough that 0.3W is where the graph starts from anyway. Where this will get gnarly though is for blocks like the DangerDen Maze4 which have a very low pressure drop, and 0.3W of hydraulic power equates to around 8.5LPM flow rates.

[Edit: Oops - corrected the axis labels - reload page to see correct labels]

11-13-2004, 05:55 AM	#19
Cathar Thermophile Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 2,538	I was able to re-use data that I had input from my simulator thing and wrote a custom perl script to munge it into a usable data set. I removed the rad + tubing effects. This is the graph that I arrived at. Re: the logarithmic thing - given Phaestus's data it would appear that since the flow rates don't go down low enough that 0.3W is where the graph starts from anyway. Where this will get gnarly though is for blocks like the DangerDen Maze4 which have a very low pressure drop, and 0.3W of hydraulic power equates to around 8.5LPM flow rates. [Edit: Oops - corrected the axis labels - reload page to see correct labels] Last edited by Cathar; 11-13-2004 at 06:01 AM.