View Single Post
Unread 09-04-2003, 03:17 PM   #7
bigben2k
Responsible for 2%
of all the posts here.
 
bigben2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,302
Default

You didn't answer my question.

Let me put it another way: what is it about the IHS that makes it so different, that we'd have to resize the die?

Obviously, as the name implies, it spreads heat. However, it's really thin, so the heat isn't going to spread very far at all. What we know for sure, is that the IHS can have a gradient of up to 3 deg C. So the IHS spreads heat, so that the cooling solution (water block, HSF) can handle the heatload a little easier, but at the cost of a gradient.

I have to assume that Intel didn't do something stupid here. Obviously the IHS also protects the core from being crushed, so the gradient is a sacrifice?

If you want to know the actual temp that you can expect from running a tested block, on a P4, then it's an added difficulty, but isn't that the case regardless?



As for the water temp measurement, that's a discussion in progress. If you want to infer that standards have been established, then I can tell you that you're wrong.
bigben2k is offline   Reply With Quote