Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bobo5195
(1) If it is way off then that could explain results.(2) In fact it makes this entire argument null and void.
|
(1) Yes. However results can be considered as (fan +rad) which gives info on rad :: Erad>E(rad+fan).
(2) No
My dispute is that you(with the Big Book backing) say that when E is above 60% the data should be taken with a pinch of salt, and when E is above 80% the data is completely,definitely wrong.
I say above 60% and 80% are acceptable values, as indicated by my modeling
You and Big Book would automatically discard this data in any case.
I would accept unless there are reasons to reject