View Single Post
Unread 03-04-2006, 12:12 PM   #2
BGP Spook
Cooling Savant
 
BGP Spook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 153
Default Re: assumptions require examination

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillA
all done and said is predicated on assumptions, they are unavoidable
but it is instructive to be aware of such, and their potential for error when ignored

wrt heat transfer, 'ideal' contact areas are assumed
and even more significantly from an experimental viewpoint:
1) the 'source' is assumed to be perfect - which is never true wrt flatness
1A) while it is merely constant if only one source is used
1B) AND if no wear or degradation is occurring - which is known not to be true
2) the DUT is assumed to be representative of all such items - which is 'true' only if statistically validated
3) AND the source/sink thermal coupling is 'correct' - again, 'true' only if statistically validated

the above does not mean that testing cannot yield conclusions,
just that extreme prudence is needed in the interpretation of test results (a sample of one is always questionable);
all of the above listed 'variables' are interrelated and indeed interactive,
change one slightly and the apparent results are quite different

for illustration an enhanced bp image is attached made with an optical flat in a reflex viewer using monochromatic light from a filtered mercury bulb,
each 'fringe' (light/dark band) represents a height (difference) of ~0.000273mm (0.000010749in.).
- the example shown has a huge valley running across it, the square outline in the center is 10x10mm
Would you care to give an absolute(or relative) minimum vs. respective maximum?

Personally, I find it difficult to accuratetly interpret multi-banded monochromatic images.

By my interpratation, guessing the number of bands to be no more than 30 (probably a high estimate, from center of "valley" to edge of "valley" and assuming that every band indicates a depression rather than any change), there is ~8 micrometers (0.00819 mm) variation between peak and depression.

Do not claim to be an expert, so maybe it is my naivety, but I would not clasify 8 micrometers "huge."
Granted ANY variation does have a negative effect.

Again, could you give absolute or relative min/max.

Edit: Changed "interpreting" to "interpret," "a change" to "any change," "And I do realise" to "Granted"
__________________
I can't spell, but I am working on it.

Last edited by BGP Spook; 03-04-2006 at 12:29 PM.
BGP Spook is offline   Reply With Quote