Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lothar5150
Let me restate the question for you. You created a radiator with a core with a surface area approximately 10% greater than a Chevette heater core. Your data shows that you get 15%-30% better performance that a Chevette heater core.
|
Actually the PA160 has about half the total metal-air surface area of the Chevette heater-core.
Quote:
|
A) Is the not predictable given the relationship between surface are and heat dissipation?
|
At half the surface area? No.
Quote:
|
B) I am asking honestly, what is the break thru? :shrug:
|
Achieving better performance with far less surface area.
Read back through this thread. The answers and reasoning are there.