Pro/Forums - View Single Post - can we agree on the basis of "C" in C/W ?

BillA · 10-22-2005, 07:39 PM

ok, I see where I shot off the rails
when you define 'W' that way for rads, do you understand the needed resolution/accuracy ?
I just bought this http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=7556455435 and I know Incoherent can do it, but who else ?
and Incoherent is probably never going to test a rad (too clever by far, lol)

why do you not wish to characterize the wb heat load the same way ?

10-22-2005, 07:39 PM	#12
BillA CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered" Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106 Posts: 4,440	ok, I see where I shot off the rails when you define 'W' that way for rads, do you understand the needed resolution/accuracy ? I just bought this http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=7556455435 and I know Incoherent can do it, but who else ? and Incoherent is probably never going to test a rad (too clever by far, lol) why do you not wish to characterize the wb heat load the same way ?