View Single Post
Unread 10-09-2005, 12:51 PM   #43
Incoherent
Cooling Savant
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vallentuna, Sweden
Posts: 410
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Les
Fine
Then I lose it when looking at the big picture ,shown very roughly.
Will have to think my own play through.
Staying with just the die for now...

Obviously you can't correct this error with a temperature offset, that is dependent on heat flux.
If you add corrections to the hole positions in the calculations (for watts q=k.a.dt/l, for die surface temp t2- (t1-t2)/(l1-l2)*l1), you can trick the equations into giving you the correct numbers. This is what I mean by "effective length"

Edit: added comments to chart
Attached Images
File Type: jpg New holes.jpg (94.4 KB, 15 views)

Last edited by Incoherent; 10-09-2005 at 01:10 PM.
Incoherent is offline   Reply With Quote