12-06-2005, 09:31 AM
|
#12
|
c00ling p00n
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: L.A.
Posts: 758
|
Re: Swiftech Apoggee review by Robotech systemcooling
Bill I do understand your point, really. However, it would have been prudent (still would be) for Swiftech to use other (additional) methods than just a TTV. Why is it that I still think the Apogee does well on the TTV because of base flexing and not because it actually performs better? This is why I think knowing the core temp is important as well, If we knew that, we'd have a much clearer picture. We all know Lee does great tests, takes his time etc. Now it is about how the blocks perform on a CPU? Seems that everyone with a die should chuck it out the window.
__________________
*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*
E6700 @ 3.65Ghz / P5W DH Deluxe / 2GB 667 TeamGroup / 1900XTX
PC Power & Cooling Turbo 510 Deluxe
Mountain Mods U2-UFO Cube
Storm G5 --> MP-01 --> PA 120.3 --> 2x DDC Ultras in Series --> Custom Clear Res
"Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity."
1,223,460+ Ghz Folding@Home
aNonForums
*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*
|
|
|