Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Les
Dunno but need careful think after re-crunching with new parameters.
Am producing new L" but slowly - am useless against the clock.
If not get your more reliable(my opinion) L", will then plug into Series2 and 3 - again slowly.
Then we look-see?
Edit
"Of course. The numbers for L''' are exactly the same. They should be, that's the whole premise."
Will find out - slowly
|
Meantime I'm ready to try a remount of the block. All this data has been the 2nd mount of the block for the sake of getting the testbed characterised. It's important that I be able to reproduce this mount for mount so that any TIM results I generate have meaning. With the previous 12x12mm fluxblock this was no problem, I was consistantly able to get very similar numbers mount for mount. Remains to be seen if it is possible with the 10x10.
My feeling is that the TIM settling time is longer with this one, can't think of any reason for that except perhaps that the paste has aged six months or so.