View Single Post
Unread 10-24-2002, 07:53 PM   #161
utabintarbo
Cooling Savant
 
utabintarbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sterling Hts., MI
Posts: 496
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by bigben2k
Les was kind enough to give me a more accurate overview of the thermal calculations. I'll give it another shot.

In the mean time, here's something to ponder: Copper 110?
According to the spec sheet on McMasterCarr's web site, copper 101 (low o2) and copper 110 have exactly the same thermal conductivity with 110 being approx. 50% of the cost.

Ponder that!

Bob
__________________
Sarcasm is yet another of the free services we offer!
utabintarbo is offline   Reply With Quote