[pHaestus]

I don't see any reason to sugar coat it; if someone is a ****ing idiot then that is what they are. But perhaps we are a bit quick to throw out allegations of stupidity or idiocy. Maybe simply pointing out what is incorrect in a review is more acceptable?

I dunno I mean we have been doing some good (a few of the worse writers have gotten fired from their reviewer jobs) but at the same time it just seems to be getting a little ridiculous.

//edit: I am very afraid when I see people continue to vote for "porn site" after it was made clear that the pornography will be of me and Joe. That's just WRONG, man.