>We have a few conflicting reports here.
One thread talks about the heating element being changed and labels the tests conducted as invalid, another says it wasn't.
I dont know anything about that! Only that there was/is a discussion at
www.Kaltmacher.de
>The pictures of the Rev 3, and 3.1 show the same amount of nozzles.
could you please link the pictures.
>Apart from the WCP tests, has there been a different testbed without the shadow of a changed testing environment, confirmed the difference between the Rev 3.1 and Rev 3.0? Even if it was a regular system?
Yes, there was a other test with a different testbed, it shows the same result. (Murks better than Cascade)
>The second possibility it this. The Cascade was tested using different, more restrictive, barbs to those which it ships with.
The test with a different testbed was made with the same presure (14KG) and the original barbs (springs?) too.
Tommy