Pro/Forums - View Single Post

Cathar · 09-22-2003, 05:50 PM

The Cascade packs twice the number jets in the same sized area as the Murks 3.1.

What changed between Rev 3.0 and Rev 3.1 that necessitated the ~4C drop in temperatures? The two blocks look near identical from the pictures shown, in terms of jet arrangement and jet density, yet 4.1C is picked up.

Edit: Just did a translation on the Rev 3.1 and Rev 3.0 descriptions. The Rev 3.1 is exactly the same jet configuration as the Rev 3.0, the only difference as stated by Tommy, the block maker was the addition of O-rings.

So once again, how is 4.1C gained between two identical blocks with just the change of the sealing mechanism used for the block?

09-22-2003, 05:50 PM	#10
Cathar Thermophile Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 2,538	The Cascade packs twice the number jets in the same sized area as the Murks 3.1. What changed between Rev 3.0 and Rev 3.1 that necessitated the ~4C drop in temperatures? The two blocks look near identical from the pictures shown, in terms of jet arrangement and jet density, yet 4.1C is picked up. Edit: Just did a translation on the Rev 3.1 and Rev 3.0 descriptions. The Rev 3.1 is exactly the same jet configuration as the Rev 3.0, the only difference as stated by Tommy, the block maker was the addition of O-rings. So once again, how is 4.1C gained between two identical blocks with just the change of the sealing mechanism used for the block? Last edited by Cathar; 09-22-2003 at 06:00 PM.