Pro/Forums - View Single Post

gone_fishin · 09-22-2003, 10:19 AM

It's shameful that people will base performance on such unscrupulous methods.
Changing the testbench midway through testing just does not cut it.

Perhaps it does perform great, but we sure don't know it by that review.

I do not see the offset inlet not being directly over the jets as a good thing. Is it just so you can see the middle better or what? This adds a restriction before the jets.

http://www.kaltmacher.de/viewtopic/t...c/start-0.html

That link shows the murk3 having 25 cups in a non honeycomb pattern and they do not appear to be precisely lined up. That would be important for jet and cup allignment. Also a gasket material is shown, this would cause each assembly of the unit not to yield the same jet height.

09-22-2003, 10:19 AM	#6
gone_fishin Cooling Savant Join Date: May 2002 Location: Da UP Posts: 517	It's shameful that people will base performance on such unscrupulous methods. Changing the testbench midway through testing just does not cut it. Perhaps it does perform great, but we sure don't know it by that review. I do not see the offset inlet not being directly over the jets as a good thing. Is it just so you can see the middle better or what? This adds a restriction before the jets. http://www.kaltmacher.de/viewtopic/t...c/start-0.html That link shows the murk3 having 25 cups in a non honeycomb pattern and they do not appear to be precisely lined up. That would be important for jet and cup allignment. Also a gasket material is shown, this would cause each assembly of the unit not to yield the same jet height.