Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pHaestus
Cathar:
Took your numbers and Lolito_fr's and put the attached graph together. I tried a straight bar graph but it got too complicated to really make sense of. Hopefully this one is a little better?
|
Looks good. I still think that something's up with lolito_fr's XP/MCP600 data point. A data point of 12.76 is what I worked out. Everything else on his graph I agree with. Suspect he may have mis-eyeballed the flow rate (have done so plenty of times myself). He must have, as the MCP600 and MCP650 give near identical flow rates (within 0.03gpm) for either the XP or the MCW6000, so the relative difference temp differences for the MCP600 and MCP650 for either block should be about equal, and they're not.
What you've done there is a nice way of presenting it.