Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Incoherent
......
The step from Reynolds number to Nusselt to "h" is fraught. I have no idea of the barrier thickness, no clue how to guess either. Empericality rules. Suffice to say that Nusselt (and thereby "h") is proportional to Reynolds. Ish.
|
Think it boils down to the "Ish"
From
here,
one of my fumbles with "ish"'
Now think "h"s are too high(over estimate of C/W(TIM)) but .....
Some interesting/useful data plotted, will digest.