|
|
Water Block Design / Construction Building your own block? Need info on designing one? Heres where to do it |
Thread Tools |
03-30-2004, 11:38 AM | #51 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Okotoks, A.B. Canada
Posts: 726
|
Quote:
what i have read in the past about system submersion not including HD and stuff... they use a liquid that is bad for the enviroment. and you don't realy want to breath it in either...
__________________
"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds" - (Einstein) |
|
03-30-2004, 11:57 AM | #52 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 221
|
Quote:
but you can use simple mineral oil.... |
|
03-30-2004, 01:40 PM | #53 |
Thermophile
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,064
|
Water has roughly twice the specific heat capacity of transformer oil. Other oils will vary but I doubt you'll see much better.
__________________
Once upon a time, in a land far far away... |
03-30-2004, 03:29 PM | #54 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Okotoks, A.B. Canada
Posts: 726
|
Quote:
Now higher heat capacity means it can absorb more heat or does it mean it can transfer heat better?
__________________
"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds" - (Einstein) |
|
03-30-2004, 04:11 PM | #55 | |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 95
|
Quote:
|
|
03-30-2004, 05:21 PM | #56 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: W. Sussex, UK
Posts: 329
|
Mercury isnt that good though. You are all getting confused by two different groups of numbers.
Conductivity = how fast heat can move through a object. Its best to thing of the object as having no flow, so not liquid, although liquids do diffinatly conduct heat. Specific Heat = how much heat energy it takes to make the temperature of an object rise. If you intend to pump a coolant or have a moving coolant in any way it needs to have a high specific heat (expeption is phasechange, i dont know enough about that) so that there is the most differnce in temp between the source and the coolant. Conduction is most important in the block/heatsink becuase it will spread the heat to a larger surface area so it is easyer to remove using coolant. relying comleatly on a coolant (direct die, submersed system or not) is not going to get good results without jets (to maximise the use of the coolant) and high flow rates. because there would be much less spreading of heat the jets would need to be aimied well at hotspots or some areas will not get cooled aswell and be hotter. Moving the heat away is much more effective that waiting for it to be disipated by air the normal way becuase it has a large amount of coolant which can absorb a lot of heat, with just a heatsink (although air is still a coolant) you miss that layer. Therefore there is no point in submerging systems except to cool components which do not have a high heat output, which are pointless in cooling anyway as the stock coolers shoudl manage... Also with a submerged system there is a lot of coolant that is not moving (= wasted) with a high heat capacity. If a waterchiller/other chiller was used it would not be able to cool it becuase of the amount of heat that the coolant holds. Mercury is not a relistic idea. Its poisnous, expensive, not availble in quantity (and i think yo need a licence or something to buy it) and iirc has rubbish conductivity. Also it would be almost imposible to pump around. This makes it bad becuase conductivity through it would not be faster than just pumping water at moving the heat. It would basicly act like one BIG insulated metal heatsink with one of the worst thermally conductive metals you can get... Transfer of heat needs a thermal gradient too... it wouldnt have much thermal gradient as it would reach eqilibrium. I expect Ive made lots of mistakes, Im not an engineer and I typed this very quickly. |
03-30-2004, 06:52 PM | #57 |
Thermophile
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,064
|
A table of specific heat capacities I made in another post:
Code:
Material Heat Capacity (J/(cm³˚C)) Aluminum 2.43 Copper 3.4788 Iron 3.5433 Water 4.186 Mercury 0.7602 Hydrogen 0.001273056 Basically higher specific heat is good as it allows your coolant to carry more energy at a lower temperature - which reduces temps overall. For a given volume if you pump 100W in you're going to raise them temp of mercury a lot more than water. Additionally it's a lot harder to handle than water and probably harder to pump. Water really is about the best coolant known to man, if it were scarce people would probably buy it to put in cooling systems.
__________________
Once upon a time, in a land far far away... |
04-08-2004, 06:18 PM | #58 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Santiago, Chile
Posts: 403
|
This is the end.
Even if this was working OK, I needed a final test to see if everything was like planned: The easy removal.
After about 10 days of use I decided it was enough, and proceeded to dismantle it in the name of progress. First test was trying to take out the hoses, fortunately silicone has a strong adhesion over silicone hoses and was like one piece. The plastic top and sides were also very firm, so it could tolerate a lot of abuse without coming loose. It was needed a sharp knife to take out the plastic parts, and then just pulling one corner was enough to take out the silicone. only a small bit of it remained inside the coils, that required a precision screwdriver to take out. Now the mobo looks like new it's just a little oiled, but i don't care, another day I may clean it with some degreaser. Last edited by nicozeg; 04-08-2004 at 06:27 PM. |
04-08-2004, 06:45 PM | #59 |
Responsible for 2%
of all the posts here. Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,302
|
Still a valiant effort. If you ever come up with a new way of doing it, let us know, ok?
The main issue, as far as I can see, is using just enough "stuff" to prevent the part from overheating, since it's an isolator, and balancing that with the cooling solution. BTW, in the military, they actually spray fluorinert onto electronic components, then recycle and cool the liquid... |
04-10-2004, 02:37 AM | #60 | |
Thermophile
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The deserts of Tucson, Az
Posts: 1,264
|
Quote:
Electrical insulators that conduct heat do exist, however the mechanism is quite a bit easier to understand, basically tightly bound atoms vibrate in sync with each other. Thus one you heat one you effectively heat the other atoms connected to it and the energy passes very quickly as a phonon vibration or something like that. At least those are the two types of thermal conduction mechanisms I'm familar with. There may be others. |
|
04-25-2004, 12:06 AM | #61 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: palo alto, CA
Posts: 164
|
that is Abit NF7-S right? can you measure the hole distance for the northbridge center to center? approximatly? please pretty please?
|
04-25-2004, 12:33 AM | #62 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: portugal
Posts: 635
|
Quote:
__________________
back. |
|
04-25-2004, 03:27 AM | #63 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: palo alto, CA
Posts: 164
|
thank you very much
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|