![]() | ||
|
|
Water Block Design / Construction Building your own block? Need info on designing one? Heres where to do it |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#51 |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
![]()
the 2 preceding posts have links to the answers to all those questions
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Thermophile
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Just shut up ;) ...
Posts: 1,068
|
![]()
All ten of them or one in particular?
![]() Anyone else have a short answer? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Da UP
Posts: 517
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Here's some recordings by my primitive testing of a modified Spiral with a true 1/2" ID inlet/outlet. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 | ||
Thermophile
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Just shut up ;) ...
Posts: 1,068
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
PS.My mistake!, I should'nt have said 10DegC was my average temp, I should have said average idle ![]() PPS. I'll have to sift through the links when I have more time, I was hoping there'd be an average 'best' for an average (100watts is right) temp. basicly where the wall is with the big boys ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by MadDogMe; 10-21-2002 at 09:10 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
![]()
g_f
always good to see more people testing any chance of a more legible image ? (I am not afraid of a link) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Da UP
Posts: 517
|
![]() Quote:
h**p://www.theforumisdown.com/uploadfiles/0802/Modified_spiral1.jpg |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 | |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
![]()
define series 1, 2, & 3; is that the vcore ? (C, D, & E)
so the load temps dropped at 3/E ??? look at the air/water differential - ?? (should be increasing as the load increases) 2.2, 4.2, 3.0 ???? at the same flow rate, with the same die size, the C/W will be the same at all power levels (hundreds of tests this way; if your's are not, there is an error) what is "Ambient load Temp" ? = air temp under load ? Water the same ? you have too many uncontrolled variables -> unless you REALLY like multivariant analysis (which I do NOT) and you'll need a LOT of data points |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wigan UK
Posts: 929
|
![]() Quote:
Possibly illustrated by : ![]() g-f. Ta for the impingement cooling link in the other thread. Some useful data. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Da UP
Posts: 517
|
![]() Quote:
But here goes ![]() There were three tests taken in all, variables being room temps noted at each test and each test at a different heat output. The three resulting C/W's are added together and averaged for the resultant (C) for water and (C) for air, hence the two C/W's. Series 1 is the numbers taken from the chart for "ambient temp" which is the air temp measured at the rad(the at the rad part I failed to make a note of in the chart) Series 2 is is the water temp at load Series 3 is the P4 cpu die temp reading There are 3 numbers for each series, one taken at a different vcore/mhz as noted in the chart. .168, .174, .224 I got these readings (computernerd watts)as you can see, @ stock = .224C/W @ 81w = .174 @ 101w = .168 They are then averaged to .189C/W I am well aware that heatload does not change C/W but these are the repeatable readings that I get, a tendency towards higher C/W at lower wattage. Perhaps the wattage used in the equation is buggered? But you can see from my chart the conclusions people will come to by doing their own testing. My water temp sensor has a resolution of .1C and as you know the P4 die reading is a .5 resolution. I included the three most commonly quoted wattage figures that people have seen in the bogus reviews across the web. I am not claiming that what my chart says is the real C/W of the block, just what I am able to measure on my system with the thermometer that I have. The room temps were different when each test was taken, as noted. The middle load air to water differential is greater (and room temp was also greatest) and it does bother me, but that is what I recorded. This is only one seating and the purpose of my posting it was to the question at hand, does the average user see a cpu temp of 10C above room temp when watercooling? I propose not, even though my test is not valid when compared to yours BillA ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#61 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Da UP
Posts: 517
|
![]()
Les, your welcome. The thread didn't go very far though, wonder why I even hesitated to post? But I'm glad it was useful to someone
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
![]()
"does the average user see a cpu temp of 10C above room temp when watercooling?"
from that sentence I will select one word . . . see and we both understand that what they will SEE has no necessary relation to what actually IS -> with the "pHaestus Thermister Calibration Mod" in fact they can SEE whatever they wish the nerd term is GIGO, no ? my error, I was presuming to talk of real numbers - sorry 'bout that in answer to the above question you said "I propose not" my response: - in terms of what they 'see', who knows ? (your post is an example, but disproves your own answer ??) - factually, you are wrong (at any 'typical' power and flow rate) period (there is a chart previously alluded to if you want facts) for the link challenged: ![]() at 40W and above there will certainally be a 10°C differential Les this is the whole problem with software/CPU "Watts" some guy with a pencil stated what he 'thought' (NOT data from Intel or AMD) - there is not a single iota of factual test data to substantiate ANY of those 'values' (sic) - indeed secondary losses are not a constant related only to the applied power, but are also affected by the various temp differentials |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 | ||
Cooling Savant
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Da UP
Posts: 517
|
![]() Quote:
![]() I was originally responding to this question, Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#64 |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
![]()
well, I would say the 'seeing' problem is mine
add 3 or 4 for the coolant/air differential and the CPU would have to be below 20W to even be close to a real 10°C differential (and yes, I did not understand your 'intent') |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 |
Thermophile
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Just shut up ;) ...
Posts: 1,068
|
![]()
I did'nt realise how much the temps increased in ratio with ambient increase!, I've only got my rig to go by, and a poorly setup creature it is too. I see 10DegC above(20DegC room) when browsing and 34.5 when load*, so that's what I went by, I forget the 28C room temps some SoCal'ers have (lucky sods!) I could live with 45+ temps if a year~round tan went with it!
![]() ![]() *what's the best proggie to stress with?, I have BurninTest that someone gave me, I usualy run that with Sandra and HW monitor for temps. BillA, what would you recomend for the average Joe Deer to read their temps by?, drilling a diode into the block BP above/near the core?, or touching core edge between block and socket?. then what about readers?, do DD5's or compunurse type readers have a resolution higher than 0.5?. are they accurate enough(not for testing of course). what's the best affordable setup?(<£100). PS. you sig should be changed to 'AirBourne~BillA' on account of going in feet~first ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|