|
|
Testing and Benchmarking Discuss, design, and debate ways to evaluate the performace of he goods out there. |
Thread Tools |
03-30-2005, 08:43 PM | #1 |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
Mounting Tests.
Now that I got my test bench together I am working on my mounting technique. Now that I am able to acquire more reliable data I can see how bad mounting technique can cause issues.
Here is the results from my first 3 mounts of my Project X block. Mount 1: (CPU temp subtracted from water in temp) 13.57C Mount 2: 10.51C Mount 3: 12.06 That is a pretty ugly thing. This is without using spring BTW. I am now going to dig up some springs and remount 3 more times. Trying to get a good mounting system down. This also shows how one mount from many of these reviewers just doesn't cut it! |
03-30-2005, 08:52 PM | #2 |
Thermophile
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,538
|
Nor even 3 mounts.
I generally just keep on mounting for about 12 times. Take note of the lowest temperature reported over those 12 mounts, and then keep mounting until I reproduce that value, or at least within 0.2C of it, twice more. If I don't see anything better then, then that's pretty much where I'm confident that I've seen what the block can do. Anything less than the best (or very close to it) mount, is only just measuring mounting variations and not what a block is capable of. |
03-30-2005, 09:00 PM | #3 |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
Yeah I was going for 8 mounts but noticed such a large difference after 3 I decided to try some springs. If things are closer after 3 I will continue the remounts. I really like this data logging with the dow sensors. Guess I need to pickup MS Excel one of these days to use the CVS logs to make those nice graphs. I got an old version of lotus with spread sheet but it's graphing is rather useless.
|
03-30-2005, 10:33 PM | #4 |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
With Springs First 3 mounts.
Mount 1: 12.13C Mount 2: 10.87C Mount 3: 11.93C |
03-30-2005, 10:53 PM | #5 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 129
|
How much spring load are you using?
|
03-30-2005, 11:05 PM | #6 | |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
Quote:
EDIT: Also it is enough to keep the block from moving at all. |
|
03-31-2005, 12:09 AM | #7 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 154
|
why wouldn't you be able to tell mounting pressure if you knew the spring specs?
assuming the block is mounted horizontally, of course knowing your mounting pressure seems crucial...esp. for comparing blocks |
03-31-2005, 08:30 AM | #8 | |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
Quote:
Repeatability is the goal anyway. That is why you make several mounts with the same method. Same way pH does it and Cathar as explained above. With decent temp monitoring you can pick up the difference. The main problem is not pressure difference but uneaveness. Once you get your technique down then every mount should be near identical which is more important than knowing the pressure. As long as it is the same each time the absolute pressure measurement is uneeded. When I get my die sim completed I got a way to measure pressure but it isn't possible with a motherboard. Basically the way JoeC does it at OC'ers. |
|
03-31-2005, 09:03 AM | #9 |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
your bp is pointed, NOT flat
lol (I'm not laughing at you jd, just the long learning process you have started) your mounting is shit buy some springs (ask the spring rate), then you know the required compression to achieve a desired load -> you measure the spring height skip torque |
03-31-2005, 09:22 AM | #10 | |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
Quote:
|
|
03-31-2005, 09:29 AM | #11 |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
suggest you look at springs already 'sorted out' for the socket/pressure you want
2 or 4 ? then buy a mounting kit with those springs from your preferred vendor I cut down a digital mic so I could lock it, and work it around all the other stuff mount the wb first, then connect the soft silicone hoses -> after 2 hrs jiggle the posts and wb, then wait another couple of hours suggest using BillA Goop from AS, settles faster than most other stuff |
03-31-2005, 09:46 AM | #12 |
Big PlayerMaking Big Money
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: irc.lostgeek.com #procooling.com
Posts: 4,782
|
I think incoherent's testing methodology has more or less rendered variations due to mounting pressure and TIM application irrelevant hasn't it?
Jaydee it took me a month or so to get really reproducible results. When I return to testing now I can usually get consistent results after a day or so of fiddling. Also I seem to get much more consistent results if I overtighten. power on, and then back off of the springs to the desired point. |
03-31-2005, 10:05 AM | #13 |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
"Also I seem to get much more consistent results if I overtighten. power on, and then back off of the springs to the desired point."
similar effect as my jiggling, work out some of the TIM |
03-31-2005, 10:10 AM | #14 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 129
|
Here's a question. When deciding on what load to use, would it not make sense to use a load where the paste performance starts to plateau? For an example, on the chart included, it would appear that between 12 and 14 turns the performance of the paste (BillA Goop) doesn't improve much. Would the user not achieve less variation using 13 turns than using 6 turns (unfortunately in this case the actual load is unknown)?
Also, would using tubes (metal or plastic) cut to desired length, fitted around the springs, help improve repeatability? Then all you would have to do is thighten the thumbnuts (evenly) until they just about touch the top of the tube. |
03-31-2005, 10:32 AM | #15 |
Big PlayerMaking Big Money
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: irc.lostgeek.com #procooling.com
Posts: 4,782
|
Repeatability may not be affected SO much because the source of the variability is presumably the thermal paste application (and how it spreads out of the interface when you tighten it down). I would assume that slightly off-flat wb mounting will result in a different final interface (and performance) than a perfectly aligned mount regardless of the pressure you use. That's separate from the force you apply in other words. By taking great care in how I do things I can generally get to within 0.2C dT of my best mount pretty consistently even with ~30 lb force.
You would really stack the deck against wbs that use the socket lugs or anything other than 4 hole mounting by cranking the springs down on the 4 hole blocks to far past specs while the other blocks are fixed at the mfgr-supplied "safe?" settings. I don't think you could put the same springs on a block that uses the lugs without shearing them from the socket... |
03-31-2005, 10:41 AM | #16 |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
non-flatness is a significant source of variation,
unless the mounting procedure is such that the same 'side' of the cone is pressed against the CPU each time (doable but difficult) - this can be seen by reading the grease (if not disturbed by dismounting) w/o a level baseline test results are meaningless, for me currently it is a 50lbf total load (non 3 lug products) - but any value can be used, presumably related to the DUT's operating conditions |
03-31-2005, 11:14 AM | #17 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 129
|
Quote:
Also, without measuring the spring rate, how do you know that, at present, the cards aren't being stacked against the 4 spring blocks? At this point we don't know what the load is at 13 turns (it may be 30lbs for all I know) but yes, if it's too high then it's not an option. |
|
03-31-2005, 11:25 AM | #18 |
Big PlayerMaking Big Money
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: irc.lostgeek.com #procooling.com
Posts: 4,782
|
You're mixing apples and oranges here somewhat.
The "13 turns" thing is from the Aquajoe blocks, which used a proprietary mounting system and made it impossible for me to use the same springs as in other tests. Cathar's "5 complete turns for AMD recommended force" is what I went with because frankly no other mfgr even mentioned anything about how far to tighten the springs down. And once I had started testing that way it was easier to continue with the same methodology than to repeat all the testing again. As far as how I know that the cards aren't being stacked against the 4 spring blocks, I don't live in a vacuum. BillA tested many of the same blocks I have (LRWW,Innovatec rev3, MCW5000-A, MCW6000-A, AquaJoe, etc etc) and the relative rankings of his C/W vs flow and my dT vs flow curves look pretty close. And I recall Bill making custom mounting plates so he could use 4 hole mounting and same springs on all the old socket lug blocks (like Innovatech Rev3). So I operate under the assumption I'm in the ballpark.
__________________
Getting paid like a biker with the best crank... -MF DOOM |
03-31-2005, 11:28 AM | #19 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 129
|
Quote:
Last edited by freeloadingbum; 03-31-2005 at 11:34 AM. |
|
03-31-2005, 11:34 AM | #20 |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
hey guys, we know the spring rates for each that we use - and we sell them too
and I will provide the spring rate to any that buy for testing (normally I define the compressed height for a given load) if purshasing springs defeats the DIY concept, then buy the springs from a spring mfgr or make 'em up as jd did BTW, Swiftech spring assys generally have limiters of some sort |
03-31-2005, 12:01 PM | #21 |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
I was using the 4 holes on an Epox 8K7A. Now I am using the 4 holes on a ECS K7S5A because the Epox was dead when I got back a few minutes ago. I was expecting that though as the heat sinks on the mosfets were literally sizzling and the caps been replaced once already.
So now I am going to swap out mobos and restart. I bought some compression springs said to be rated at 16lbs per inch. A little stiff maybe but I think I can work with that until I decide which stock kit to order. Probably be the Swiftech as I want a MCW6000 anyway. Just as well buy the block and hardware at the same time. So now to the question of how much load to apply to each spring? I assume I want to take to total load I want and divide it by 4? Then use that number on each corner? Another thing crossed my mind as I was looking for springs.... What about the difference in weight of the blocks? Is the weight of the block going to change the pressure? |
03-31-2005, 12:08 PM | #22 |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
And for the TIM I am using the silicone crap from Radio Shack. I figured very little to no setup time for it. Is that a bad idea?
|
03-31-2005, 12:31 PM | #23 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 129
|
Quote:
|
|
03-31-2005, 12:51 PM | #24 |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
I am using 6-32. I got everything together with the ECS board to find my Dow sensor for the water temp to has died... Odd. Well back to calibrating probes... Maybe I will get 3 of them together and get water out temp aswell...
|
03-31-2005, 03:35 PM | #25 |
Responsible for 2%
of all the posts here. Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,302
|
McMaster has a pretty good spring selection, and a guide too.
Their guidelines also refer to compressing a spring at no more than 50% of total compression, otherwise you de-rate the spring (i.e. you "bend" it, so it won't behave the same way again). It took me a bit of calculating to find the right spring, and I still didn't get it right; I got a spring that reaches the target compression at maximum spring compression, leaving me no "play". Follow Bill here; many good tips: use a limiter, use a washer on top and bottom of the springs, and if possible (or necessary), use a sleeve; it'll help you get steady, repeatable mounts each time. Compress a little bit more than your target, then loosen it a bit, to help the TIM settle nicely. Whatever you do, just do it the same way each time. I have yet to hear some good advice on cleaning up a mess, between remounts. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|