|
|
General Liquid/Water Cooling Discussion For discussion about Full Cooling System kits, or general cooling topics. Keep specific cooling items like pumps, radiators, etc... in their specific forums. |
Thread Tools |
06-23-2004, 03:09 AM | #201 | |
Thermophile
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,538
|
Quote:
|
|
06-23-2004, 03:28 AM | #202 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wigan UK
Posts: 929
|
So, we will see some fumbling numbers eventually.
Excellent, look forward to playing with them. |
06-23-2004, 03:49 AM | #203 | |
Thermophile
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,538
|
Quote:
With water, the turbulence enhancement appears to offer around a 20% improvement in h over the closest equivalent mathematical model. That 20% is mostly emperically determined. I roughly predict that the 5x more viscous liquid would roughly reduce that gain over the standard model to around 5-8% above what the standard model would predict for h for that level of viscosity. Again, not plotted. Am more interested in emperical evidence and formulating rough theory, than attempting to assume that I have a hard theory that works. |
|
06-23-2004, 08:30 AM | #204 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wigan UK
Posts: 929
|
Quote:
Or this is an interpretation of pH's results? |
|
06-23-2004, 12:27 PM | #205 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 129
|
Why not just add 25% glycol to your system and see if the theory holds true. Are you measuring your temps through the socket or the internal cpu sensor?
Edit: I just realized you don't have the block back yet Last edited by freeloadingbum; 06-23-2004 at 12:34 PM. |
06-23-2004, 03:02 PM | #206 | |
Thermophile
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,538
|
Quote:
Am aware of the impact of viscosity. Am unsure of the scale of the impact. Have some thoughts. An uncorrelated data set of 1 (Phaestus's results) is hardly something to form a theory around (unless it involves sticking one's hand in fire). Guesswork at this level Les. |
|
06-23-2004, 03:12 PM | #207 |
Thermophile
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: U.S.A = Michigan
Posts: 1,243
|
Thanks for the update Cathar. Some interesting developments.
The gains of the G5 vs other blocks will be of great interest. Thanks for sharing what you can at this time. |
06-23-2004, 04:33 PM | #208 | ||
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vallentuna, Sweden
Posts: 410
|
Quote:
From properties here. Some charts: Density and Viscosity Giving Kinematic Viscosity Quote:
(how do you push 4 lpm through a 2mm diameter tube?) The step from Reynolds number to Nusselt to "h" is fraught. I have no idea of the barrier thickness, no clue how to guess either. Empericality rules. Suffice to say that Nusselt (and thereby "h") is proportional to Reynolds. Ish. Last edited by Incoherent; 06-23-2004 at 05:00 PM. |
||
06-23-2004, 05:11 PM | #209 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wigan UK
Posts: 929
|
Quote:
Think it boils down to the "Ish" From here, one of my fumbles with "ish"' Now think "h"s are too high(over estimate of C/W(TIM)) but ..... Some interesting/useful data plotted, will digest. Last edited by Les; 06-25-2004 at 03:17 AM. |
|
06-23-2004, 05:20 PM | #210 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vallentuna, Sweden
Posts: 410
|
[quote=Les]Think it boils down to the "Ish"
Earlier in this thread(page 4) one of my fumbles with "ish"' Now think "h"s are too high(over estimate of C/W(TIM)) but ..... [quote] Unsure of the exact numbers but your curves look like what I'm getting Les. Will check specifics later. Here are some Nusselt curves, more proportional to "h" than Re.# is. Last edited by Incoherent; 06-24-2004 at 02:56 AM. Reason: layout, grammer |
06-26-2004, 06:34 PM | #211 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wigan UK
Posts: 929
|
Predicted effects of changes in Kinematic Viscosity on h(conv coeff) at constant Density, Conductivity and Heat Capacity.
|
06-26-2004, 07:53 PM | #212 | |
Thermophile
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,538
|
Quote:
Have completed re-drawn plans for the G4/G5 which should improve things slightly, and should not be at the expense of "plain water" performance. Still, it is rather an interesting relationship, and definitely something for people to consider before dumping heaps of glycol in their cooling loops. |
|
06-26-2004, 08:46 PM | #213 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wigan UK
Posts: 929
|
Suggest "longevity" is included in the Impingement(Flomerics) calculations.
The Velocities(4.17m/s and 6.67m/s) are those in the nozzle. |
06-26-2004, 10:11 PM | #214 | |
Thermophile
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,538
|
Quote:
|
|
06-26-2004, 11:07 PM | #215 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wigan UK
Posts: 929
|
Yes, it is, also, my understanding is that it is not intended for Submerged Jet Impingement(SJI).
Probably a "fumble to far" to suggest any major "longevity" contribution. Will wait for your model, when wb's details are released, before further sums. |
06-27-2004, 01:29 AM | #216 | |
Thermophile
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,538
|
Quote:
So yeah, acceptable as a good guidleline for initial starting points. |
|
06-28-2004, 03:05 AM | #217 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wigan UK
Posts: 929
|
Quote:
If C/W(TIM) ~ 0.1: yes. However if C/W(TIM)~ 0.05 , I think I prefer Sieder-Tate( eg Re(3x1mm Entry) from here ) Graphs are still being developed. Edit: Typo: "C/W(TIM)~0.05" did read "C/W~0.05" Last edited by Les; 06-28-2004 at 07:03 AM. |
|
06-28-2004, 02:05 PM | #218 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hertfordshire, England
Posts: 164
|
I am unsure if this contributes anything to your divagations....
I refer to Incoherent's graph showing relationship between Re and kinematic viscosity. Isn't there an equilibrium between kin. visc. and Re number? If kin visc. decreases then velocity increases and hence Re goes up as well. Just some idle thinking here, if worthless just ignore and do not reply |
06-28-2004, 02:36 PM | #219 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vallentuna, Sweden
Posts: 410
|
Quote:
Last edited by Incoherent; 06-28-2004 at 05:15 PM. Reason: spelling |
|
06-28-2004, 02:47 PM | #220 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vallentuna, Sweden
Posts: 410
|
Quote:
I'd love to see if there really is a difference. All very well to play with numbers but it's nice to see real life. (I discovered something else today. Hot water can freeze faster than cold water. An old wives tale that is actually true but not understood.) Last edited by Incoherent; 06-28-2004 at 05:34 PM. |
|
06-28-2004, 03:21 PM | #221 | |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
Quote:
sure the viscosity changes, and with good instrumentation AND good technique the changed performance is readily apparent - this suggests an 'optimum' temp (IF the wb has been so designed) tweek away, are the blind fumbling for the light switch which is not even connected ? sorry guys, these are numbers for the sake of numbers |
|
06-28-2004, 04:22 PM | #222 |
Thermophile
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,538
|
I'm just waiting for my blocks to get back to me...
|
06-28-2004, 05:15 PM | #223 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vallentuna, Sweden
Posts: 410
|
Quote:
The viscosity in itself however, is highly relevant. Last edited by Incoherent; 06-28-2004 at 05:23 PM. Reason: Further thoughts |
|
06-28-2004, 05:19 PM | #224 | ||
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wigan UK
Posts: 929
|
Quote:
Numbers were used in the design: Quote:
|
||
06-28-2004, 05:28 PM | #225 |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
I think I understand what is being played with,
but when the desired/reasonable result is arrived at via fiddling with the factor of interest; . . . . . ignore my skepticism, it is not new news on this topic - (h |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|