Some Interesting/Confusing Data from testing

[Les]

Originally Posted by unregistered

"If we adjusted the water temp to maintain a constant die temperature at the different flowrates, the secondary path gradient would remain unaltered, even though the primary "die >contact area>water" path C/W's changed with flowrate. The "Heat absorbed" is constant. If you plot this again at several temperatures I am not sure there would be any relationship except the "Heat absorbed" changing with temperature."

interesting
I can do this both on an insulated heat die, and a ttv (~mobo + CPU)
will report - eventually

Data from heat die tests in any insulated condition may be revealing.
Having a leisurely re-look at your ancient data http://www.ocforums.com/showthread.p...0&pagenumber=2
Look forward to the eventuality.

[BillA]

jeez Les, a thread from 2 years ago ?
yea, needs a re-look

[Les]

Have re-looked and possibly only seen the sensitivity to measurement.
This was very early Billa work since which equipment has been upgraded innumerable times.
Have included data in graph from Incoherent's thread


The cascade data plotted here are the preliminary data reported here