|
|
Testing and Benchmarking Discuss, design, and debate ways to evaluate the performace of he goods out there. |
Thread Tools |
11-29-2005, 11:45 AM | #1 | |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England
Posts: 6
|
Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
Quote:
Okay, got that out of the way - that juat about explains why this thread is here I have the following test equipment - I know it's not near the best but it will provide myself and others with a way to compare different manufacturers fans. DAWE Sound Level Meter (797900) Tenma (726638) Anemometer Fans (so far collected): AeroCool Turbine 1000 Fan Cooler Master A12025-12CB-4KN-L1 PL12S12L A.C. Ryan 12CM UV fan SilenX IXTREMA IXP-74-14 Akasa Model: DFB122512L Akasa AK-183-L2B Orange AcoustiFan 120 AF120C NMB Model: 4710KL-04W-B10 PANAFLO Model: FBA12G12H PANAFLO Model: FBA12G12M Themaltake Thunderblade Model: TT-1225 That's it for now. But will continue to add more The current proposed test methodology will be: Fans measured in free air The fan will be measured 1 Meter away, horizontal to the dB sensor. I have an mCUBE digital which I believe uses PWM to power the fans, however not all the fans respond well to it - the Ryan goes nutty. So using both methods to power the fans would be a good idea, especially with PWM becoming more and more popular. More details can be found on the original thread at EP-UK. Please advise, constructive criticism welcomed - I want this to be a useful resource for others |
|
12-08-2005, 04:07 AM | #2 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England
Posts: 6
|
Re: Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
C'mon folks this is spose to be a useful resource for everyone. Marci pointed me here as you guys are meant to be the more intelligent cooling poeple
Upgraded the CFM meter to: CFM MAster - DCFM8901 |
12-08-2005, 11:40 AM | #3 |
Responsible for 2%
of all the posts here. Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,302
|
Re: Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
Why don't you start by listing exactly what you want to test on these fans?
-Noise -actual airflow Does that sum it up? For noise, ideally you'd have a soundproof room (or enclosure), and a sound recorder for which you know the characteristics, throughout the human sound spectrum. For airflow, you need a fan testing chamber. U need links? |
12-08-2005, 04:00 PM | #4 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dunedin NZ
Posts: 735
|
Re: Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
sounds like a good experiment to me.
Get marci to send you a pa.120 too and see if you can get hold of a heatercore, and one (or both) of the black ice series to test pressure resistance vs noise - that would be especially useful here.
__________________
Hypocritical Signature I tried to delete: Procooling: where scientific principles are ignored because big corporations are immune to mistakes and oversights. |
12-08-2005, 04:50 PM | #5 |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
Re: Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
Note that a thermal anemometer reads the air velocity over the sensor, how do you intend converting that (local) velocity to CFM through the fan ?
what is the mic floor (lowest level) ? |
12-08-2005, 05:07 PM | #6 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 400
|
Re: Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
I woudl of thought a thermal anemometer woud convert all that stuff internaly either that or there is an ASME, ISO etc spec on it.
|
12-08-2005, 05:22 PM | #7 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 400
|
Re: Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
While I’m here, and sorry if this sounds like random facts. I type like a robot apparently.
You’re going to want to measure back pressure and its effect on noise there is also some effects of near fan geometry causing excess noise. This is noted very handily in the BTX spec, basically the dominant sound frequency you should get out is caused by the fan blades interacting with the supports. This is why artic silencers suspended fans are so good as the fan supports are so far away even though having no shrouds makes them awfully inefficient as fans. To create a back pressure maybe a long duct with an orifice plate (a plate with a circular hole) this should create a back pressure to work with. Measuring without a back pressure is pretty much pointless as all fans are subjected to one. There is an effect as well of air recirculation back around to the entrance from the exit. If the fan is completely free and some back pressure being caused by momentum conservation if it’s hanging from springs (the suspended springs move as the fan creates a force trying to balance the momentum of the air out, so it deflects to balance everything out). One thing to remember about thermal anemometers is they like a nice uni-directional flow so it might be better to put some lamina flow guides in. This may be nothing more than a box grid made out of paper but it should help. I’ve never used the things 9themral anemometers) myself though, so you may get away with it. On the sound pressure meter make sure to measure when there is less noise about. If your in a built up area this means staying up late or getting up early. And keep the measurement point and microphone direction as this will help make sure the measurement is a constant. |
12-08-2005, 07:06 PM | #8 |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
Re: Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
ah, 'free flow' ?
speed bumps ahead |
12-08-2005, 08:17 PM | #9 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dunedin NZ
Posts: 735
|
Re: Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
Quote:
__________________
Hypocritical Signature I tried to delete: Procooling: where scientific principles are ignored because big corporations are immune to mistakes and oversights. |
|
12-09-2005, 04:58 AM | #10 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 400
|
Re: Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
I was thinking more cross hatch from a ice cube tray (preferably for making small ice cubes). I swear ive seen a plastic grid around somewhere, in something common that would be useful. Could try acetate slides for overhead projectors.
|
12-09-2005, 08:07 AM | #11 | |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
Re: Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
Quote:
none of this is possible as he wishes to test eh ? |
|
12-09-2005, 11:47 AM | #12 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CENTRX
Posts: 75
|
Re: Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
Testing free air tells you next to nothing, fans can change 10 dBA as you go up the res. curve.
Standard practice usually involves an INCE Plennum or "Mahling Box" (george Mahling IBM) Bacically a box frame covered by a mylar flim with a sliding gate at the rear with a pressure tap on the inlet side. Allows you to test the fans across the /flow/pressure curve If you request flow data most manufacturers will provide it. then all you have to do is match the pressure point. probably only cost 100-$200 to make. You have to watch at the 1 m that you do not get noise canceling bounce, mic/source location is important |
12-10-2005, 03:53 PM | #13 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England
Posts: 6
|
Re: Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
That is what I was looking for!
I would like to disagree that measuring the fans in free air indicates 'nothing'. It gives people (myself) some kind of comparative figures which are much better than comparing all those different manufacturers figures! I do however understand it is not ideal; but better than nothing. I would like one of those fancy boxes mentioned, but am strapped for cash. Adding another variable to the situation would also complicate the results - although good for some I was thinking about strapping the fans to my CM Stacker as a test frame for another set of dB results - however, this rig would change over time If anyone has an idea or suggestions for a basic resistance setup that could be easily implemented I'm open. I was thinking of attaching a sheet of Bounty over the intake?! Cheers for all the advice so far folks |
12-10-2005, 04:47 PM | #14 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England
Posts: 6
|
Re: Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
It has also been suggested that a fan filter (or one on each side) would do the job. Another suggestion was to stick the fan to the centre of a rad in pull config...
(I have a PA120.3 I could do this with) |
12-11-2005, 09:38 AM | #15 |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
Re: Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
look into 'free air', you do not understand the experimental issues
|
12-11-2005, 08:08 PM | #16 | |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: High Altitude Lab
Posts: 94
|
Re: Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
Air Flow Vs. Pressure Characteristics
Parallel & Series Operation Stall of Axial Flow Fans Basic Fan Laws How to measure Airflow vs Pressure How to Achieve Low Noise Accoustic Noise EMI Introduction: Forced Convection Cooling How to select the right fan or blower Quote:
actually not a very complicated test device, oh except the part where there are the calibrated nozzels, those defy DIY even if you can machine them yourself, and the part where you have to adjust your findings based on the relative humidity and barometric pressure thats fun Im sure
__________________
LurkyLoo |
|
12-11-2005, 08:24 PM | #17 | ||||
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: High Altitude Lab
Posts: 94
|
Re: Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
Quote:
only without the anechoic room http://www.sunon.com.tw/english/wealth/tech/tech-07.htm Quote:
of course some are better than others http://www.comairrotron.com/engineering_notes_03.asp Quote:
University of British Columbia Fan Noise & Airflow Research Project @ SPCR Quote:
__________________
LurkyLoo Last edited by Ice Czar; 12-11-2005 at 08:52 PM. |
||||
12-12-2005, 07:02 AM | #18 |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
Re: Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
"This means that the manufacturers' specifications are often not directly comparable. It takes a careful, trained engineer to calculate specifications obtained from disparate techniques into comparable numbers. Even for them, it might actually be easier and certainly more accurate to take prospective fan samples and re-measure with one consistent technique."
which is the conclusion I came to after comparing the actual fan preformance when connected to a sink or rad fan performance is so unique that fitting a specific fan to a sink by test will yield improved performance over that having the 'best specs' |
12-12-2005, 12:28 PM | #19 | |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: High Altitude Lab
Posts: 94
|
Re: Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
and gets even more complicated once the fan combined with the component is actually placed in its environemnt with other components
http://www.comairrotron.com/engineering_notes_03.asp Quote:
along with some tips about how they can get the most from thier choice (read the whole link) and factors that will influence the sound signiture even after its been installed (temperature gradient, dust level ect)
__________________
LurkyLoo Last edited by Ice Czar; 12-12-2005 at 12:35 PM. |
|
12-12-2005, 02:45 PM | #20 |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
Re: Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
lets have a shift here as this is my intended audience
1) when a fan is mounted with a shroud it is possible to get a plenum pressure indicating roughly where that specific match-up falls on that fan's PQ curve (w/unconfined/unconstrained discharge) - anyone have an 'experimental' feel as to how shallow the shroud might be before the pressure was non-uniform (otherwise assumed) - pitot tube considerations ? (airspeed too low to matter ?) 2) if it is accepted that the fan inlet air temp is reasonably characterized by TC msmt in each quadrant over the fan mid-blade (the Intel procedure), would the same be true for the fan/rad discharge ? - with some other factoids could calc mass/vol air flow ? |
12-12-2005, 02:51 PM | #21 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 400
|
Re: Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
In an effort not to make this to much of a downer.
If the fan is shrouded (by a relatively non confining shroud) and is placed far way from the source of resistance and the other side is free air then it’s fairly independent of the surroundings (except of course back pressure). This should PARTLY remove the effects of close rad distance that bill was talking about. To be more correct the fan should be 10 diameters from the exit and exit into a smooth duct expanding out from the fan at greater than 15 degrees to a large (d x 2 say) radius but I wouldn’t worry too much about that. For sound levels just use dBA and add a few of your own thoughts. dBA is industry standard. |
12-12-2005, 03:05 PM | #22 |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
Re: Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
no bobo, you need to do some of this
the 10 dias have friction, how is this addressed ? better to replicate the use conditions for 'real' results I can run a traverse and measure the variation too, better than guessing I suppose what do you think of the heat balance notion ? too loose ? |
12-12-2005, 09:51 PM | #23 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dunedin NZ
Posts: 735
|
Re: Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
Quote:
__________________
Hypocritical Signature I tried to delete: Procooling: where scientific principles are ignored because big corporations are immune to mistakes and oversights. |
|
12-13-2005, 12:06 AM | #24 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CENTRX
Posts: 75
|
Re: Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
I think you have to keep in mind that absolute values will not be realized in your testing.
Lacking a anechoic chamber, outside interference will affect any measurement you take. While doing some fan development I was forced to go to work at 2 am in the morning. Idling trucks a block away, air conditioners on adjacent buildings, refrigerators, flourescent lights, your breathing.....will affect the result. Additionally reflective surfaces can be a real problem. even if you get your background down to 30dBA it will still add several dBA to your result- 38 dba can end up being 42 dba. Best for comparative is measure something like 8 in. from the inlet as interference factors fade into the background overwhelmed by the dominate source and provide a higher degree consistancy. Calibrated nozzels can be bought for a few hundred dollars - if you are testing a narrow range you can get by with just a couple. Some plywood and a counterblower and you have an airflow test chamber |
12-13-2005, 08:15 AM | #25 |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
Re: Performance Vs Noise - Experimentation
"Some plywood and a counterblower and you have an airflow test chamber"
thats the stuff we need more of !! start a thread ub, better yet jack this one |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|