|
|
Random Nonsense / Geek Stuff All those random tech ramblings you can't fit anywhere else! |
Thread Tools |
10-07-2005, 07:00 PM | #26 |
The Pro/Life Support System
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 4,041
|
Ahh just read all that. Good fun. But wheres the making fun of the others penis size? or mother? I mean really this thread needs that as much as it needs more cowbell!
This thread is much better with a few high octane beers in the belly
__________________
Joe - I only take this hat off for one thing... ProCooling archive curator and dusty skeleton. |
10-07-2005, 07:01 PM | #27 | |
The Pro/Life Support System
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 4,041
|
Quote:
__________________
Joe - I only take this hat off for one thing... ProCooling archive curator and dusty skeleton. Last edited by Joe; 10-07-2005 at 07:22 PM. |
|
10-07-2005, 07:03 PM | #28 | |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
Quote:
|
|
10-07-2005, 07:16 PM | #29 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Surf City USA
Posts: 433
|
Quote:
|
|
10-07-2005, 07:19 PM | #30 | |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
Quote:
|
|
10-07-2005, 07:26 PM | #31 |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
jd - technical questions are so much better
yes, proven so - think about the individual who knows first hand the answer yes; if used it should be configured as a calorimeter - see Inchoerent's work but better, if using the data to compare to commercial thermal solutions, is to use the same heat source as is prevalent in industry Swiftech's posted data is all recent, comparable, and utilizes the same heat source; without question the present data is more accurate than the previous set, as the next will be improved yet again Last edited by BillA; 10-07-2005 at 07:28 PM. Reason: spflng |
10-07-2005, 07:29 PM | #32 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Surf City USA
Posts: 433
|
Yeh what he said
Last edited by Lothar5150; 10-07-2005 at 07:39 PM. |
10-07-2005, 07:40 PM | #33 | |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
Quote:
|
|
10-07-2005, 07:44 PM | #34 | |
Thermophile
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,538
|
Quote:
The temperature of the heat-die is not known, the size of the heat die is not known, nor is the efficacy of the heat-die to IHS contact as a variable of waterblock base->IHS interaction known either. IMO, the Intel TTV isn't too far from measuring the internal temperature of an oven by a thermometer on the outside. I know that Intel proposes it as a heatsink validation mechanism, but even Intel states that once a heatsink has been validated on a TTV that it must also be qualified by taking actual CPU temperatures in a real system. IMO, if one wants to simulate an IHS based scenario in a fixed and repeatable fashion, then the heat die and the IHS need to be a one-piece affair, thereby the die->IHS variable is removed and can be corrected by applying a correction factor based upon observed TIM behavior, but applying such a correction factor would only be for validation purposes. |
|
10-07-2005, 08:09 PM | #35 | |
Responsible for 2%
of all the posts here. Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,302
|
Pop corn, chips, coke/beer, etc... Hey this "Pibb xtra" stuff isn't too bad!
The allegation here (once one puts aside the irrelevant "communications") comes down to: Quote:
http://coolingworks.com/order/index.html From all of the available information from both CoolingWorks and Swiftech, I see a very close association (read: "strategic partnerships"), and I have no reason to suspect that Bill went to Coolingworks without both companies being fully aware. ref: http://swiftnets.com/aboutus.asp (2003 section). Otherwise, I see no work done by Bill that didn't disclose a manufacturer affiliation (albeit maybe not directly). Then there's the China connection, or as it turns out, Willie at HWLabs, whose based in the Philippines, but I see another reference from China... and JSE. Maybe I just don't see it yet. More Pibb xtra... |
|
10-07-2005, 08:19 PM | #36 |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
jd
buy a manual for $17 or so, what you have is fine - you outbid me on it ! Cathar the term is 'case to air', where 'case' is the IHS nothing at all to do with the silicon temp I was not attempting to make any characterization of the silicon temp this activity is to characterize thermal resistance where the transfer is between the IHS and the heatsink, and the IHS heating is done by a device designed to do so I believe the device may be considered to be more representative than a correction factor applied to a different device - speculation on speculation here your concern would be better placed with the 'size correction factor', how will you determine such ? what is the baseline ? Ben's WTBA ? every time I have the opportunity to follow 'industry practice' I do so, avoids time in discussion and cross-testing (and my ongoing self education) |
10-07-2005, 08:42 PM | #37 |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
Ben, you are an idiot; you agree with Bruce that employment precludes objectivity
well, the base of the pyramid needs to be filled also - be fruitful and multiply (multiple wives in some religions eh ?) |
10-07-2005, 08:48 PM | #38 | ||||||
Thermophile
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,538
|
Quote:
Quote:
An Intel TTV is fine for heatsink validation, for providing a cursory and repeatable "pass or fail" assessment of heatsink solutions. It is not representative of actual real-system cooling efficacy, and not even Intel treats it as holding that level of determination. It is merely a validation tool, not a final performance measuring device. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
There are bare-die CPU's from both Intel and AMD aplenty. There are bare-die GPU's almost solely. The variances in CPU die->IHS contact are well known and documented and observed far and wide. How are such catered for with an IHS-only unquantified-variable-laden testing methodology? It would seem to me that insistance upon adherence to a particular testing solution which is both clearly flawed and even acknowledged by the testing solution's manufacturer as being inadequate for purposes of final performance assessment is purely a matter of convenience and little else. I would say that everyone absolutely loved your work with your old thermal testing setups, not because they were "standard", but because they challenged people to do things correctly, to know and quantify the variables, and sought to explore and understand the very nature of what it is that we were all concerned about measuring, being the die temperatures and effects of mounting variations and TIM layers. I see using a "standard" TTV where at least 3 variables are not even known, and worse, completely ignored, as turning one's back on the good work and progress laid down before. I, for one, don't understand it... |
||||||
10-07-2005, 09:12 PM | #39 | |
Responsible for 2%
of all the posts here. Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,302
|
Quote:
Your record (IMO) stands up very well all on its own. If anything, I think you should have remained a solo outfit, and be an outsourcer to all these people but hey, that's just me. :shrug: Sounds like we could use another thread for Intel's TTV, but there isn't much info available, even through queries. |
|
10-07-2005, 10:22 PM | #40 |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
I agree that 'validation' testing is different, and uses somewhat different tools of necessity, than testing new ideas and concepts; how could it be otherwise ?
my innovation was based on necessity, but the best available tool should be used - not 'my best' suggest listing also the limitations of a copper heat die; they are considerable for me the $64 ? is consistancy and repeatablity, and the IHS is easier to work with in attaining these goals R&D warrants the relative complexity of a calorimeter setup, but thats all I would use it for ah Ben, the affliation is known - so then what ? my record, indeed |
10-07-2005, 10:29 PM | #41 | ||||||
Pro/Vendor
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 267
|
Quote:
BTW what are you saying Erick, that CoolRad-12T is not a BIX rev.1 clone? and please keep the marketing crap to yourself, out of this thread Quote:
It was not me, who posted comments about preventing the Chinese invasion of the US market and what not, and yet designed a radiator for the Chinese... Quote:
Erick don't try to BS me... we know each other for how long now? Quote:
What data are you exactly talking about? There is no data regarding the single-pass BI radiator from BillA or not that I have seen... When pH received the single-pass Pro3 BillA was talking highly about it... and when Scott raised this question: Quote:
Quote:
so what data are you exactly talking about? he didn't post any data to support his positive comments, and didn't post any data to support his vague references regarding the single-pass Bi radiators either... all I know is that he made comments regarding the single-pass Pro3 as "pretty clear what it is, a BIP 3 single pass, lots of capacity there !, "I would give Willie credit for his rads, they are in fact 'made for computer cooling' " etc. Link to the thread here and now he makes vague references to these new line of single-pass BI rads (which BTW are not new at all to us Pro/Coolers), giving the impression that the performance of this line would be underwhelming... and yeah BillA is really good at word play, you gotta give him that... So why all the flip-flopping now eh? and oh yeah according to Bill I'm pointing out the facts because I'm dishonest and / or I'm a money chaser... yet i don't sell these single-pass radiators... i'm not a HWlabs forum hitman either... so gimme a f*cking break... and if you agree with him on this Erick, F*ck you too... "looks like a match made in heaven" said Jubba The Hut, The Star Inc's chairman
__________________
www.cooltechnica.com Last edited by dacooltech; 10-09-2005 at 12:18 AM. |
||||||
10-07-2005, 10:33 PM | #42 | |
Pro/Vendor
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 267
|
Quote:
hard to tell...
__________________
www.cooltechnica.com |
|
10-07-2005, 10:36 PM | #43 | ||
Pro/Vendor
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 267
|
Quote:
and this single post really summarizes it all for us: Quote:
and no data whatsoever... if you got the exclusive rights on the single-pass radi, then would it become the best sh*t on the market? and when I pointed out the facts by giving reference to the old ProCooling thread all of a sudden I became dishonest, and a money chaser is that it?
__________________
www.cooltechnica.com |
||
10-07-2005, 10:45 PM | #44 |
The Pro/Life Support System
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 4,041
|
bruce, you are 100% the master of forum quotes!
The internet is your bitch.
__________________
Joe - I only take this hat off for one thing... ProCooling archive curator and dusty skeleton. |
10-08-2005, 12:38 AM | #45 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 148
|
Quote:
I"ll need to read most of the thread in the morning I don't think I'm compitent right now. |
|
10-08-2005, 01:03 AM | #46 | ||||||
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Surf City USA
Posts: 433
|
Quote:
2. Formulation of an hypothesis to explain the phenomena. In physics, the hypothesis often takes the form of a causal mechanism or a mathematical relation. 3. Use of the hypothesis to predict the existence of other phenomena, or to predict quantitatively the results of new observations. 4. Performance of experimental tests of the predictions by several independent experimenters and properly performed experiments. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Know each other....Bruce I spent more time talking with Mark and Bucky at Frozen. That was drink beers with them one night …now that is a solid retail operation. |
||||||
10-08-2005, 01:30 AM | #47 | |
Pro/Staff
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Klamath Falls, OR
Posts: 1,439
|
Quote:
|
|
10-08-2005, 09:22 AM | #48 |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
agreed, the high point of the thread so far
|
10-08-2005, 01:44 PM | #49 | |||||||||||
Pro/Vendor
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 267
|
Quote:
BillA used to chop people's heads off in the forums, when they made similar performance claims without any data to support them... yet he made claims regarding the single-pass radiators without any data... very scientific eh? so just like you said, let's be straight here... Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Bruce: welcome back Bill did you design those radis? I thought those radis are also from China, no? FYI a company from China contacted me about those radis couple times within the last few months...[quote] Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I didn't mean we're best buddies, drinking beer, chasing women etc, by knowing each other Erick lol I meant cut the BS, by posing as a big corporation, and using titles like I'm the President/CEO and Bill is the CTO etc. You don't have hundred employees working for you AFAIK, and you are no Swiftech either... We are a small company too. Cooltechnica used to be only me when I first started it, CoolingWorks was only you when you started it AFAIK. So is it only Bill and you, now?
__________________
www.cooltechnica.com Last edited by dacooltech; 10-09-2005 at 12:01 AM. |
|||||||||||
10-08-2005, 03:13 PM | #50 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Surf City USA
Posts: 433
|
Quote:
Armelin Widget Corporations dba CoolingWorks Incorporated in California 2003 check the public records. Bruce keep talking Sh#? You’re only motivating Bill and me that much more. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|