Go Back   Pro/Forums > ProCooling Technical Discussions > General Liquid/Water Cooling Discussion
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat

General Liquid/Water Cooling Discussion For discussion about Full Cooling System kits, or general cooling topics. Keep specific cooling items like pumps, radiators, etc... in their specific forums.

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 07-12-2003, 10:21 AM   #26
jaydee
Put up or Shut Up
 
jaydee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
Default







Note the O-ring and the allen wrench were extra and I chose the metal mounting hardware option over the nylon. I don't like this set of mounting hardware much. I would rather have screws with a pan head instead of having to use a nut on the backside. Also the nylon washers and springs are to big and the springs are not stout enough. I had to completely compress the springs to get a acceptable (to me anyway) amount of pressure. Just as well not use them at all. I never liked using springs anyway.

More pics and results later, hopefully tomorrow afternoon....
jaydee is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-13-2003, 06:16 PM   #27
jaydee
Put up or Shut Up
 
jaydee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
Default

Here is my first set of numbers:

XP1700+@1800mhz
1.75V
Abit KD7

Thermocoupler under CPU with socket mod: 43C
Onboard from Windbond software that came with board: 40C
Room temp: 26C
Water temp: 30C

This is under a Distributed Folding Load.

Going to load up CPU Burn now and see what it will do.
jaydee is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-13-2003, 06:29 PM   #28
JokerCPoC
Cooling Savant
 
JokerCPoC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hesperia, CA
Posts: 130
Default

It would be a better design If It had a center input and two smaller outputs, To Me at least. Nice pics though. My cpu has a Temp of 105F (41C according to the LED readout) right now and the motherboard Temp is 93F. I know water cooling can with or without a Tec make the CPU cooler though.
__________________
My Blog
Joker1: 2-265 @ 2.25GHz cpus(OSA265FAA6CB)[H8DCE] soon
Joker2: 1-165 @ 2.65GHz cpu[Bios/Clockgen405], MS-6702E v1.0(9.3 Bios)
Joker3: 1-270 @ 2.40(2nd-270 cpu soon)GHz cpu[Ntune], K8N-DL v1.03(1007 Bios)
Joker4: 2-285 @ 3.25? GHz cpu[Ntune], (soon) K8N-DL v1.03(1007 Bios)
Joker5: 2-285 @ 3.25? GHz cpu[Ntune], (soon) K8N-DL v1.03(1007 Bios)
(10.10GHz now, 25.43GHz maybe? Crunchin 4 SetiBoinc for the PC Perspective Killer Frogs)
JokerCPoC is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-13-2003, 06:43 PM   #29
jaydee
Put up or Shut Up
 
jaydee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by zoom314
It would be a better design If It had a center input and two smaller outputs, To Me at least. Nice pics though. My cpu has a Temp of 105F (41C according to the LED readout) right now and the motherboard Temp is 93F. I know water cooling can with or without a Tec make the CPU cooler though.
Your temps mean absolutly nothing. Sorry to break it to you.
jaydee is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-13-2003, 06:57 PM   #30
JokerCPoC
Cooling Savant
 
JokerCPoC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hesperia, CA
Posts: 130
Default

Well whoppee due. They do to Me and the Bios agrees with MBM, So there. At least I have heatsink mounting holes on ALL 3 major places on the motherboard (CPU, NB & SB) . But then Epox is known for It's overclocking ability and what Do You have? An Asus or an Abit? Abit isn't too bad, Asus I wouldn't touch with an Anti-Matter 10' pole. If I did neither the Asus nor the pole or Maybe Me would exist of course.
__________________
My Blog
Joker1: 2-265 @ 2.25GHz cpus(OSA265FAA6CB)[H8DCE] soon
Joker2: 1-165 @ 2.65GHz cpu[Bios/Clockgen405], MS-6702E v1.0(9.3 Bios)
Joker3: 1-270 @ 2.40(2nd-270 cpu soon)GHz cpu[Ntune], K8N-DL v1.03(1007 Bios)
Joker4: 2-285 @ 3.25? GHz cpu[Ntune], (soon) K8N-DL v1.03(1007 Bios)
Joker5: 2-285 @ 3.25? GHz cpu[Ntune], (soon) K8N-DL v1.03(1007 Bios)
(10.10GHz now, 25.43GHz maybe? Crunchin 4 SetiBoinc for the PC Perspective Killer Frogs)
JokerCPoC is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-13-2003, 07:10 PM   #31
jaydee
Put up or Shut Up
 
jaydee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by zoom314
Well whoppee due. They do to Me and the Bios agrees with MBM, So there. At least I have heatsink mounting holes on ALL 3 major places on the motherboard (CPU, NB & SB) . But then Epox is known for It's overclocking ability and what Do You have? An Asus or an Abit? Abit isn't too bad, Asus I wouldn't touch with an Anti-Matter 10' pole. If I did neither the Asus nor the pole or Maybe Me would exist of course.
What the hell are you talking about? Your temps are meaningless. The onboard probe is garbage and is also thrown off by all that CFM your pushing around the socket. No shit it is going to read the same in the bios, that means NOTHING. The onboard probe is simply not accurate especialy if there is ANY air flow around the thermisters. have you read anything on this site?

Do you even know what the thermocoupler I am using is? Has nothing to do with the onboard probes.

You can post your BS temps around but your not going to get away with it on THIS site.


http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/sho...&threadid=6943
http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/sho...&threadid=6949
http://www.procooling.com/articles/h...hermal_dio.php
http://www.procooling.com/articles/h...sting_cali.php
http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/sho...&threadid=5765
http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/sho...&threadid=6442

Last edited by jaydee116; 07-13-2003 at 07:21 PM.
jaydee is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-13-2003, 07:10 PM   #32
winewood
Cooling Savant
 
winewood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: in my chair
Posts: 574
Default

Quote:
They do to Me and the Bios agrees with MBM
fyi- the Bios and MBM both use the save variable to bring you the exact number from the same equipment.
__________________
-winewood-
winewood is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-13-2003, 07:21 PM   #33
JokerCPoC
Cooling Savant
 
JokerCPoC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Hesperia, CA
Posts: 130
Default

Well When I get an Enermax unit like this,

I'll hook up My custom made probe and
We shall see what the difference is then, Ok? We'll see what an Epox can do with the Gemin Cool.
__________________
My Blog
Joker1: 2-265 @ 2.25GHz cpus(OSA265FAA6CB)[H8DCE] soon
Joker2: 1-165 @ 2.65GHz cpu[Bios/Clockgen405], MS-6702E v1.0(9.3 Bios)
Joker3: 1-270 @ 2.40(2nd-270 cpu soon)GHz cpu[Ntune], K8N-DL v1.03(1007 Bios)
Joker4: 2-285 @ 3.25? GHz cpu[Ntune], (soon) K8N-DL v1.03(1007 Bios)
Joker5: 2-285 @ 3.25? GHz cpu[Ntune], (soon) K8N-DL v1.03(1007 Bios)
(10.10GHz now, 25.43GHz maybe? Crunchin 4 SetiBoinc for the PC Perspective Killer Frogs)
JokerCPoC is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-13-2003, 07:25 PM   #34
jaydee
Put up or Shut Up
 
jaydee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by zoom314
Well When I get an

I'll hook up My custom made probe and
We shall see what the difference is then, Ok?
LOL, thats not going to be much better than what your using now. Read the damn links I posted. You might learn something. Use at very least a type K thermocoupler (the worst type, which I am using) and preferable a type J or what PH has done in the links posted.
jaydee is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-13-2003, 07:30 PM   #35
Coot
Cooling Neophyte
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Leics
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by zoom314
Well When I get an Enermax unit like this,

I'll hook up My custom made probe and
We shall see what the difference is then, Ok? We'll see what an Epox can do with the Gemin Cool.
The 8RDA DOES NOT produce accurate temp readings
Coot is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-13-2003, 08:29 PM   #36
jaydee
Put up or Shut Up
 
jaydee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
Default

Forgot to add I removed the worthless spings and crappy mounting hardware from DD and used my own hardware and no springs.

-----
Thermocoupler wires running under the CPU with the socket mod and the thermocoupler is attached to the bottom of the CPU.

----

The thermocoupler reader. It still isn't perfect but it is better then the onboard.

I ran CPU Burn for an hour and temps showed .5C warmer on the onboard and stayed the same on the TC. The TC only reads whole numbers so it probably did go up .5C on it to.

Also note these temps are with the HydroThruster 500GPH pump at full speed. Don't have a GPH measurment at this time....
jaydee is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-13-2003, 08:45 PM   #37
pakman
Cooling Neophyte
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: WA State
Posts: 76
Default

Jaydee,

for those who aren't fortunate/or smart enough to have a thermocoupler, are there any other commercial WB's you can compare those maze4 results with or just with your homebrew's?

thnks
pakman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-13-2003, 08:54 PM   #38
Skeptic
Cooling Neophyte
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Washington
Posts: 48
Default

I am interested in this as well. I am waiting to get my Maze 4 before I even start any testing with the Maze 3, that way I can see a side by side comparison of both.

My best friend has the EXACT same components as myself, cpu, mobo, ram, watercooling accesories. Only difference will be the Maze 4 vs the Maze 3. We will set it up using the same water mixture, in the same room with same temp, etc. to see what differences, if any, there are.

Will let you know the results as soon as I get the Maze 4 block tomorrow.
Skeptic is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-13-2003, 08:56 PM   #39
jaydee
Put up or Shut Up
 
jaydee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by pakman
Jaydee,

for those who aren't fortunate/or smart enough to have a thermocoupler, are there any other commercial WB's you can compare those maze4 results with or just with your homebrew's?

thnks
No, I don't have any other commercial blocks and don't plan on getting any. I just bought this Maze 4 to compare my own blocks to. There should be some better "official" reviews of this stuff sooner or later I would think. Maybe pH will have some of these blocks when he starts testing.

P.S. the thermocoupler can be had for $17.00 at Wallmart.
jaydee is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-13-2003, 09:05 PM   #40
Skeptic
Cooling Neophyte
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Washington
Posts: 48
Default

You keep mentioning this thermocoupler and socket mod??? Sorry, new to all this, but what is this socket mod?

Are you referring to some way to get the thermocoupler inside to read accurate tempatures without damaging the socket?
Skeptic is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-13-2003, 09:19 PM   #41
jaydee
Put up or Shut Up
 
jaydee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Skeptic
You keep mentioning this thermocoupler and socket mod??? Sorry, new to all this, but what is this socket mod?

Are you referring to some way to get the thermocoupler inside to read accurate tempatures without damaging the socket?
http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/sho...&threadid=6967
jaydee is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-13-2003, 09:58 PM   #42
Skeptic
Cooling Neophyte
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Washington
Posts: 48
Default

Damn good read. Thanks!
Skeptic is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-13-2003, 11:47 PM   #43
airspirit
Been /.'d... have you?
 
airspirit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Moscow, ID
Posts: 1,986
Default

Okay, the three PCs are as follows with various tests. The room was air conditioned to 75F (outdoor thermometer). The following are LOAD temps with all three PCs doing full load runs, using the onboard thermistors. Yeah, I know these suck ass, but for comparison's sake they will show a temperature difference, okay? Don't make me teach a course on relativity, guys! Anyway, as you all know, these are all on one loop pushing approximately 7-8GPM/1000CFM with a common coolant store. Here we go:

#1: Athlon 700@770, Black Edge (34C)
#2: Athlon XP 2100+@2550, 1.70V, Black Edge (48C)
#3: Athlon XP 2500+@2650, 1.80V, Maze3 (46C)

#1: Black Edge (33C)
#2: Black Edge (46C)
#3: Maze4 (52C)
Maze4 more restrictive?

#1: Black Edge (35C)
#2: Maze3 (44C)
#3: Maze4 (53C)
Maze3 less restrictive? #1 is odd here.

#1: Black Edge (34C)
#2: Maze3: (45C)
#3: Black Edge (50C)
The Black Edge does better?

Currently I have the setup at BE/M3/M4, and I'm not happy with the performance at all. I've had to back my speed on the 2500+ down to 2550 Mhz and down .25V because of the temps and sudden instability due to it. I would NOT recommend this block over the Maze3 unless they redesign it. It appears that they were trying to shave costs off of the manufacturing end to make more profit at retail. By trying to pass off an inferior product at the same price by telling you it'll increase performance ... well, that pisses me off. The Black Edge block does better in my tests and it is a 3/8" block that costs around $25 new. I wouldn't buy one of these Maze4s for any reason from what I learned.
__________________
#!/bin/sh {who;} {last;} {pause;} {grep;} {touch;} {unzip;} mount /dev/girl -t {wet;} {fsck;} {fsck;} {fsck;} {fsck;} echo yes yes yes {yes;} umount {/dev/girl;zip;} rm -rf {wet.spot;} {sleep;} finger: permission denied
airspirit is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-14-2003, 12:51 AM   #44
Skeptic
Cooling Neophyte
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Washington
Posts: 48
Default

I am not understanding here. Maybe I am not seeing the numbers right, or maybe my logic is flawed.....but wouldn't you want to run all 3 blocks on all 3 different comps to run a comparison test?

Maybe it is just me but, you say the black edge performs better, but you never tested the Maze blocks on comp 1 at all, and the Maze 3 outperforms the Black edge on comps 2 and 3. So how does the Black edge perform better?

I can see where the Maze 4 does in comparison on comp 3, but you never tried it on comps 1 or 2.

No offense, but this isn't exactly what I would call a conclusive test. 8P
Skeptic is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-14-2003, 01:07 AM   #45
Razor6
Cooling Savant
 
Razor6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 192
Default

Well you can extrapolate a rough guess from what he posted.

On system 2 the Maze3 performs 1-2 degrees better than the Black Edge. On system 3 the Maze4 performs 2-3 degrees worse than the Black Edge. Hence, the Maze 3 appears to be the best, the Black Edge comes in second, and the Maze 4 comes in last.
Razor6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-14-2003, 08:56 AM   #46
bigben2k
Responsible for 2%
of all the posts here.
 
bigben2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,302
Default

From a designer's perspective, the lack of a center inlet, has got to really hurt the performance. This Maze4 is actually a step back, as it's now down to a simple side to side flow configuration.

The side to side flow configuration only has one advantage: it's the least restrictive. The problem is that the added flow can't make up for the simplicity of the design.

It reminds me a lot of that French block, who posted that again?
http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/sho...&threadid=5731

That french design is actually superior though, because of the added turbulators, and all the tweaking added to it.

I have to agree: there are better blocks out there than this Maze4, for the price. Better luck next time, DangerDen!
bigben2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-14-2003, 09:14 AM   #47
jaydee
Put up or Shut Up
 
jaydee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by bigben2k


I have to agree: there are better blocks out there than this Maze4, for the price. Better luck next time, DangerDen!
I don't know I am not having near the dissapointment airspirit is. 13C over water temp under CPU Burn and DF load isn't to bad at all. :shrug:
jaydee is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-14-2003, 10:47 AM   #48
jaydee
Put up or Shut Up
 
jaydee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by jaydee116
I don't know I am not having near the dissapointment airspirit is. 13C over water temp under CPU Burn and DF load isn't to bad at all. :shrug:
I just re-read airspirits post and caught onto the fact he is using a 2500+@ 2650mhz at 1.80V. I am only running 1.75Vcore at 1800mhz on one of the cooler Tbred A 1700+'s. I have a theory that there isn't enough copper on the Maze 4 to handle the higher load he is using especially being there is no center inlet. The Maze 4 has much more copper and possible a thicker base as does the Black Edge. When I get home tonight I will cranck up the Vcore and OC as high as I can get and then re-post the new numbers. My board will go up to 2.35Vcore so I should have a little success.
jaydee is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-14-2003, 10:48 AM   #49
airspirit
Been /.'d... have you?
 
airspirit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Moscow, ID
Posts: 1,986
Default

Again, part of my problem could be due to the parallel configuration between the PCs and the load balancing that causes with the water flow. I would guess from my tests that the M4 is the most restrictive of the blocks (more so than the BE), and that causes it to perform bad. Even if this is the case, however, I'm pumping at least 2GPM through it since my #1/#2 loops are 3/8" and my #3 loop is 1/2" ID. This could be completely due to the system I'm using, but even if this is the case it would suggest performance risks for different users. Why take a risk if you don't have to?
__________________
#!/bin/sh {who;} {last;} {pause;} {grep;} {touch;} {unzip;} mount /dev/girl -t {wet;} {fsck;} {fsck;} {fsck;} {fsck;} echo yes yes yes {yes;} umount {/dev/girl;zip;} rm -rf {wet.spot;} {sleep;} finger: permission denied
airspirit is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-14-2003, 11:02 AM   #50
bigben2k
Responsible for 2%
of all the posts here.
 
bigben2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,302
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by jaydee116
I just re-read airspirits post and caught onto the fact he is using a 2500+@ 2650mhz at 1.80V. I am only running 1.75Vcore at 1800mhz on one of the cooler Tbred A 1700+'s. I have a theory that there isn't enough copper on the Maze 4 to handle the higher load he is using especially being there is no center inlet. The Maze 4 has much more copper and possible a thicker base as does the Black Edge.
Actually, 1/4" is appropriate, for this design, IMO.

I think that if anything, you could get some business out of modding these: add a center inlet, try to jet that inlet a bit on either side of the center fin, and that should yield a substantial improvement. You might even be able to shave a mm or two, off of the baseplate. Alternatively, you could drill a cup, ~1 or 2 mm deep, >5mm wide on either side of those fins, which would be a heck of a lot easier to do.
bigben2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(C) 2005 ProCooling.com
If we in some way offend you, insult you or your people, screw your mom, beat up your dad, or poop on your porch... we're sorry... we were probably really drunk...
Oh and dont steal our content bitches! Don't give us a reason to pee in your open car window this summer...