|
|
Snap Server / NAS / Storage Technical Goodies The Home for Snap Server Hacking, Storage and NAS info. And NAS / Snap Classifides |
Thread Tools |
02-27-2007, 09:10 PM | #51 | |
Thermophile
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Yakima, WA
Posts: 1,282
|
Re: Comparing transfer rates with different RAM amounts
Quote:
|
|
02-28-2007, 09:05 AM | #52 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sheridan
Posts: 18
|
Re: Comparing transfer rates with different RAM amounts
Now now, not all of us are familiar with what units have common hardware. Mentioning that speeds will be similar or representative didn't sound like actual comparative numbers to me. Remember, there are those of us new to the realm of Snaps and those of you who have been around a while. Everyone has to start somewhere. Welcoming neophytes might be more productive than chastising their efforts to make a meaningful contribution. JELo
|
02-28-2007, 09:57 AM | #53 | ||||
Thermophile
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Yakima, WA
Posts: 1,282
|
Re: Comparing transfer rates with different RAM amounts
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I would LOVE for you to explain to me how your negative response towards my efforts and how little value it had for you and others, was in any way a meaningful contribution (as you put it) and are now being chastized for? But nevermind, it would not be productive to the actual topic at hand, so don't bother. The point is, if the information was not useful for you, then add to it or move on. There is no reason or gain for you to have to tell me and everyone else how un-useful it was for you. And as an added bonus, you might want to read the information before you make that declaration. Even getting past the "similar" semantics, the information you wanted about day to day use and were complaing about not being there, was in fact there. You just had to actually read it to see it. Now, after you have been here a while and have answered the same question over and over and over and over, and then when you put time and effort into dealing with that problem, some little smart ass wants to come back and complain about it, let's see how you respond, okay? Until then... Well.... Lastly, this disagreement betwen us here is not productive to this topic or this forum. It is a negative influence and even serves to cause those who are willing to help out around here to not want to do so further. If you wish to pursue this with me further, feel free, but do it in PM or e-mail (mine is listed). I refuse to participate in this useless arguement further here, and degrade this topic any further. |
||||
02-28-2007, 10:47 AM | #54 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sheridan
Posts: 18
|
Re: Comparing transfer rates with different RAM amounts
I think ya might be overreacting a bit. We're all on the same team here. I don't see this as anything more than a minor missunderstanding - nothing worth getting that worked up about. JELo
|
02-28-2007, 03:03 PM | #55 |
Thermophile
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Yakima, WA
Posts: 1,282
|
Re: Comparing transfer rates with different RAM amounts
For those interested, Blue68f100 has done some tests on his 4100 with newer/larger drives for some confirmation. His results were right in line with my previously posted results (minor difference in that he is not measuring the overhead included).
Anyone measuring 2x00 units to confirm? Hallis? Or maybe 1x00 units to see how much difference the CPU makes? |
02-28-2007, 03:54 PM | #56 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South Bend, IN
Posts: 385
|
Re: Comparing transfer rates with different RAM amounts
Quote:
__________________
Snap Server 4100, 4x120GB Seagate Drives, RAID 5, version 3.4.803 |
|
02-28-2007, 03:56 PM | #57 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South Bend, IN
Posts: 385
|
Re: Comparing transfer rates with different RAM amounts
Quote:
__________________
Snap Server 4100, 4x120GB Seagate Drives, RAID 5, version 3.4.803 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|