Go Back   Pro/Forums > ProCooling Technical Discussions > Xtreme Cooling
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar JavaChat Mark Forums Read

Xtreme Cooling LN2, Dry Ice, Peltiers, etc... All the usual suspects

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 12-04-2005, 07:40 AM   #1
DNA
Cooling Neophyte
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 71
Default 377/437W Peltier Qmax Rating

While were beating this peltier rating subject to death, the 62mm square 437W Qmax peltier stocked by Frozen CPU also has 2 Qmax ratings.

Th = 50C
Qmax = 437.3W
I(Qmax) = 32.8A
I(dTmax) = 25.2A
Umax = 26.7V
dT = 74.5K

Th = 26.8C
Qmax = 376.8W
I(Qmax) = 30.4A
I(dTmax) = 23.7A
Umax = 24.8V
dT = 66.0K
DNA is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-04-2005, 01:02 PM   #2
laxman
Cooling Neophyte
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: evanston
Posts: 41
Default Re: 377/437W Peltier Qmax Rating

yes and so do all peltiers, peltiers are more effective and higher temperatures. thus the Qcmax is always lower and 30c then 50c. Personally I do not think that this big of a pelt is needed for effective cool and it would generate so much on the hot side that you would probably get the same proformance from a 270 qcmax pelt.
laxman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-04-2005, 04:10 PM   #3
DNA
Cooling Neophyte
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 71
Default Re: 377/437W Peltier Qmax Rating

Quote:
Originally Posted by laxman
Personally I do not think that this big of a pelt is needed for effective cool and it would generate so much on the hot side that you would probably get the same proformance from a 270 qcmax pelt.
One of the primary justifications for using phase-change to cool high thermal load CPUs is to achieve a better overclock at a lower Vcore. To carry that reasoning a step further is why a high Qmax peltier is beneficial based on ones anticipated thermal load.

One case in point, an AMD X2 4800 running at a conservative overclock of 2.8Ghz with a Vcore of 1.5 would produce a thermal load of ~153 watts. I doubt that a 270W Qmax device would allow one to reach those levels.
DNA is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-04-2005, 07:32 PM   #4
laxman
Cooling Neophyte
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: evanston
Posts: 41
Default Re: 377/437W Peltier Qmax Rating

That wasnt my point, it is how are you going to cool a massive 430 watt pelt. A 430 watt pelt moves 430 watts in perfect conditions but to be real lets say it moves 350w. So you have to cool 350w it moves plus the around 100w it generates meaning a total of 500w. Lets say you have a cool which has a c/w of .1, then the hot side temp will be 45 degrees above ambient (if ambient is 25c then it is 70c). At 153 watts your pelt will have a Dt of around 45. This means the cold side temp will be around 35c. Lets do the same thing with a 270 qc max pelt. Lets say it moves about 200 watts and generates 50w for a total of 250 and a hot side temp of 50c. This would make for a Dt of 30 meaning a cold side temp of 20c. This shows two things one it is hard to cold a large heat load and the hot side of the peltier. Although still a 270 watt peltier does better because it produces less heat and the hot side is cooled better.
laxman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-04-2005, 09:17 PM   #5
DNA
Cooling Neophyte
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 71
Default Re: 377/437W Peltier Qmax Rating

Quote:
Originally Posted by laxman
That wasnt my point, it is how are you going to cool a massive 430 watt pelt. A 430 watt pelt moves 430 watts in perfect conditions but to be real lets say it moves 350w. So you have to cool 350w it moves plus the around 100w it generates meaning a total of 500w. Lets say you have a cool which has a c/w of .1, then the hot side temp will be 45 degrees above ambient (if ambient is 25c then it is 70c). At 153 watts your pelt will have a Dt of around 45. This means the cold side temp will be around 35c. Lets do the same thing with a 270 qc max pelt. Lets say it moves about 200 watts and generates 50w for a total of 250 and a hot side temp of 50c. This would make for a Dt of 30 meaning a cold side temp of 20c. This shows two things one it is hard to cold a large heat load and the hot side of the peltier. Although still a 270 watt peltier does better because it produces less heat and the hot side is cooled better.
I use a 377W device (Th = 27C) with a dTmax of 66. Pc = 19.9V x 24.6A. The estimated thermal load with the pumps heat contribution is 143W. Under sustained maximum load conditions, the coolant temp is 30.4C, Tc = -14.6C and Ta = 20.3C.

As for how to cool it, http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/showthread.php?t=11683

Using the same hardware and ambient condition that yielded these results, it is not possible to duplicate the noted Tc with a 270W Qmax device. With Pc = 15.4V x 30A, Tc would be in the range of -4C to 2C.

Last edited by DNA; 12-04-2005 at 09:53 PM.
DNA is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-04-2005, 10:52 PM   #6
killernoodle
Thermophile
 
killernoodle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,014
Default Re: 377/437W Peltier Qmax Rating

Quote:
Originally Posted by DNA
One of the primary justifications for using phase-change to cool high thermal load CPUs is to achieve a better overclock at a lower Vcore. To carry that reasoning a step further is why a high Qmax peltier is beneficial based on ones anticipated thermal load.

One case in point, an AMD X2 4800 running at a conservative overclock of 2.8Ghz with a Vcore of 1.5 would produce a thermal load of ~153 watts. I doubt that a 270W Qmax device would allow one to reach those levels.
Whats the point of running it at a lower Vcore if you are gonna peltier it? If it does the same OC on water with a higher Vcore, why go through the trouble?

The whole point is being able to overclock higher, not volt lower.
__________________
I have a nice computer.
killernoodle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(C) 2005 ProCooling.com
If we in some way offend you, insult you or your people, screw your mom, beat up your dad, or poop on your porch... we're sorry... we were probably really drunk...
Oh and dont steal our content bitches! Don't give us a reason to pee in your open car window this summer...