|
|
Hardware and Case Mod's You Paint it, Cut it, Solder it, bend it, light it up, make it glow or anything like that, here is your forum. |
Thread Tools |
12-14-2003, 06:50 PM | #1 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: portugal
Posts: 635
|
old P4 1.8 OR new Celeron 2.2?
thats right!
for the same price i can get a P4 1.8 256 kb cache, or one of this new Celerons 2.2 256 kb cache. Both are 400 mhz buz. I have to choose one of these and it will not be overclocked. What do you recomend? |
12-14-2003, 07:41 PM | #2 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portugal, Europe
Posts: 870
|
P4.
http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1927 ( Brr, pah, celerons só se for para calços de porta...)
__________________
"we need more cowbell." |
12-14-2003, 08:49 PM | #3 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 190
|
actually, the celeron only has 128k of cache, and i would see if i could get a 1.8ghz 512k, they shouldnt be too much more...
__________________
-Insert Signature Here- |
12-15-2003, 03:14 AM | #4 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: portugal
Posts: 635
|
Yes if the P4 is a 512 kb cache one (still havent checked) i will go for that too.
But everithing points out to be a normal 1.8 256 kb cache. But EY, with that diference in performance, surelly all P4 are better then cellery... Thanks. (Dass os Celerons na valem um C**** ) |
12-15-2003, 01:52 PM | #5 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Okotoks, A.B. Canada
Posts: 726
|
i think you should also consider pn count.
is the old 1.8 Ghz p4 a 423 Pin count or 478 pin count?
__________________
"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds" - (Einstein) |
12-15-2003, 01:54 PM | #6 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: portugal
Posts: 635
|
478.
The board that i will give has a 478 package, so the cheap proc must be a 478 also. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|