I know it's luck of the draw on which protein you fold.

Why do I seem to be getting the hardest/longest proteins???
At about 132 points per WU nobody else is even close.

I'm not really complaining, just wondering.

Yes I have tested it. I have 5 HT enabled P4s folding. The worst I have found was a couple that had no gain but most gain about 15%.

Here is what I have folding right now.

http://webpages.charter.net/chew_toy/1/EMIII.gif

I'm getting strangely easy proteins that are worth jack. To put this in perspective, my 8 proteins got me 222 points, and Murray's 9 are well over 1000 (more like 1200). Incoherent's 3 proteins got him 228 to my 222. I need to get my friends to fold but they're worthless. They won't even run their systems 24/7 because they 'can't sleep with the noise'. I tell you, they whine like little girls.

Allright,,, I'm signed up and folding!:)

Ive been taken over... :eek: :eek: :eek:

WTG Chew_Toy :D

What method did you use to benchmark your machines?

I tested with actual protiens I was folding and times per frame. That is the only way to know, some protiens that have the same batch number and points fold at different rates.

I have 4 machines folding now.
P4 2.4
P4 2.53
P4 2.6
P4 2.8 o/c 3.57
need to find more machines to fold :evilaugh:

Were almost in the top 1000 :D w00t

Not to shabby for having just started folding... not that we are going to make it to the top though :( Damn [H] and their huge concoction of idiot folders :mad:

:cool: We're 999!!!

Does anybody know which yields better results? WU's less than 5 megs vs WU's greater than? I switched a few machines over to smaller WU's and I am now getting on average 57 points per WU. When I had them set to WU's larger than 5 megs I was getting on average 35-40 points per WU. Is this just a coincidence?

*edit* We're now in the 800's :evilaugh:

For those who like graphs
It looks like we need to have a team ranking of 613 or better to start getting individual stats. That should happen within an hour or so. :D
More stats (if you're not looking for per-user graphs)

On the HT front; my (limited) testing seems to show nearly 100% improvement by running 2x clients per HT CPU on Linux 2.4.20-8 (i.e.: no slowdowns on per-frame times vs. running single client). Will update when I parse more logs later.

For EOC it is top 500 that have the individual scores. Statsman has them for the top 1000

http://www.statsman.info/folding2stats/39339.html

The EOC stats will show more details and is closer to actual time for the updates than Statsman's site. We should be in the top 500 next week.

Wow, there must be a lot of teams moving up ranks rapidly. I had just done some casual clicking and noticed that teams ~rank 600 seemed to have indiv. stats.

We're 553!! Should be 500 next Tuesday, possibly sooner.

Okay, I'll help get us there faster and sign up with 2 home machines and 4 work machines (All P4 3.0+) :D

Top 500 keep it going!

Those stats are cool... We should be in top 300 in a month or so...

It will take a while for the individual stats to give somewhat accurate info tho. A lot will be ok a week from sunday after the weekly stats reset this sunday and get a week of true stats.

or mine - which have all 380,000+ individual stats for the past 28 days...

i have a
p4 3.2 HT with 2 process
celeron 1.2@1.6
tbird 1.33
p4 2.8 HT with 1 process
yet the main stanford page says i only have 3 process ?

are 2 of the processes new?

whell i found electron microschope thanks to chey toy and relized that the tbird takes like 170 hours to do a wu and the 2.8 is on a 400 frame unit so neither of them have finished a unit yet to submit so they dont know it exists yet

erg this sucks im not sure if i am insane or what i have looked my logs over and i see that i have turned in more WU then any of the stat pages say

Was this recent completed WUs? Sometimes there is a delay between the machine log and the stats page.

whell as of right now i think i have 9 or 10 units counted but in the logs i have about 15 or 16 i just woke up and havnt checked every thing but it has been at least 12 hours sense i have submited any thing
i would assuem that that lag should be enough also on a side note the last 4 days all my machines have been running tinker core 400 frame take for ever to run and get only a coulpe hundred points becse lets be honest me helping science is a side effect of my trying to clime the point scale any way i can prevent tinker core units from dling

correction i have credit for 10 and i have uploaded 12 the last upload was at 2004-10-23 17:09:57 PDT it is now 2004-10-24 9:44:00 EST

Are you counting those for Team VAPOCHILL/Waterchill Team that shows you have contributed for?

? i shouldnt be submiting for them i am going to have to check my config files

checked that is a diff clone to bad thats not me it would be nice to have those points o well maybe they were corrupt wu's that got uploaded

For me it's the science/research mostly. It's my line of work. I know what you mean about the points though, it's kind of addictive :) .