Quote:
P.S. I should mention that I did this all a couple of years ago with a palamino processor which didn't have anything mounted on the surface of the cpu, unlike the newer athlons. The clear tape I used may not work so well for you. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Now if you'd used glycol, with its excellent wetting and hardcore capillary action... |
Quote:
|
I think most of the mounting force would be transmitting by the areas of direct block-die contact. Water would squirt out rather than be pressurized. And I think that's why you got good results -- minimal TIM, maximum contact.
The way to find out is to test with a range of mounting force. Compression of the trapped air (less volume, higher thermal conductivity) is one of the ways TIM joints improve with greater force (I don't think water would be as subject to the 'more pressure = thinner TIM' mechanism like high viscosity goops). |
I just wanted to say that most of the air in which ever liquid you use will float upward w/ some vibration. So that would leave the air all on once side of the die w/ a mid tower case (depending how the socket is positioned). And we could allow enough room between the die and the seal for the air to remain w/ out affecting thermal contact. It will be the difference between thermal contact and thickness of TIN VS. thermal conductivity.
So if/when I try this out any other liquids worth trying? |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(C) 2005 ProCooling.com If we in some way offend you, insult you or your people, screw your mom, beat up your dad, or poop on your porch... we're sorry... we were probably really drunk... Oh and dont steal our content bitches! Don't give us a reason to pee in your open car window this summer...