Pro/Forums

Pro/Forums (http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/index.php)
-   Random Nonsense / Geek Stuff (http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/forumdisplay.php?f=15)
-   -   Bush or Kerry: slam the US! (http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/showthread.php?t=10677)

bobkoure 01-31-2005 06:42 PM

You seem to have missed the point.
It wasn't at all clear that the folks there might even want democracy. The fact that a good number of 'em voted (and at least some of those folks must have felt that they were taking a definite risk to do so) indicates (to me) that some number of 'em might actually want some kind of democratic system (democratic in very loose terms here, not "US system" but simply that those who govern are in some way responsible to the governees).
No magic turning point. No expectation that all will be well (could all be totally lost, and, given our lack of preparation to deal with the country after a successful invasion, I'm not at all convinced that it won't be lost). Certainly no expectation that the life of an average person there is going to be any better tomorrow than it was the day before yesterday.

BillA 01-31-2005 06:59 PM

yes; it is the existence of the opportunity, and the apparent inclination of the general populace to participate
a long haul ahead, indeed
many a slip twixt the cup and the lip

nexxo, how many years did it take for Britain to become democratic ?
tyrants do not go peacefully, again - look at the USSR
this is a process, and a positive step was taken

consider an alternative, no one participated
then your words, and more, would be valid

Lothar5150 02-01-2005 01:49 AM

Here is another email.

...Well, I'm still working and will be through the night. Caught a couple hours this afternoon, and then got up to work with the election workers again. This has been a very proud moment in my life. After all the nay saying from around the world, I watched a people risk death to vote. They came out in numbers larger than expected. The enemy tried hard to stop them, but in the end they failed and the people won. I have no idea where this election will take them, but at least for today Iraqis were a free people. Our liaison/trainer to the Iraqi Army - Guillermo Rosales- watched as the Iraqi Colonel wept when he sent his soldiers off to guard polling sites. Not because he feared for them, but because they were cheering and proudly moving off to help guard their fellow citizens.



The insurgents did try to intimidate,...hell, I should say kill the voters, but the Marines and Iraqi Army made sure it was the other way around. There was an insurgent mortar team that was lobbing shells at a voting center. Waukegan Marines found and killed them. We had other incidents, but the voters kept on coming. I sat here in the CP, and could only hear the reports from the Marines out in the field, but I was very proud of them, and happy that every Marine leaving here knows he, and those that won't come home, made a difference. Through the efforts of 2/24, not one Iraqi Citizen was seriously injured and was able to vote if he or she wanted.



You can probably tell I'm pretty elated, but this has been a great day. It's not going to stop the insurgency, but it will de-legitimize it. People will still be killed by a bunch of animals, but those animals will no longer be likened to freedom fighters, because everyone knows they fought against freedom.



God bless and Semper Fidelis,

Mark

nexxo 02-01-2005 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobkoure
You seem to have missed the point.
It wasn't at all clear that the folks there might even want democracy. The fact that a good number of 'em voted (and at least some of those folks must have felt that they were taking a definite risk to do so) indicates (to me) that some number of 'em might actually want some kind of democratic system...

No magic turning point. No expectation that all will be well... Certainly no expectation that the life of an average person there is going to be any better tomorrow than it was the day before yesterday.

No, you missed mine. If that is our expectation, then why all this warm fuzzy job-well-done feeling that people are expressing in this thread?

Quote:

Originally Posted by unregistered
yes; it is the existence of the opportunity, and the apparent inclination of the general populace to participate

They lined up to vote not because they believe in this democracy, but because they want to believe in something, anything at all. They want hope. Anything that says that all their loss and suffering and uncertainty is not for nothing, because that thought would be intollerable.

Let's see if we are going to let them down again.

BillA 02-01-2005 03:03 PM

"Let's see if we are going to let them down again."

yes, the US record is truly terrible
the Kurds, and Shiites, both encouraged and then left to swing; horrible
I don't think the Kurds are going to be so gullible again (i.e. US assurances are total BS)
be interesting to see if we have the forces, and inclination, to block the Turks

but we have a history of abandoning surrogate fighters, Bay of Pigs anyone

bobkoure 02-01-2005 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nexxo
They lined up to vote not because they believe in this democracy, but because they want to believe in something,...

How do you know this? I'm pretty skeptical of the war, and frankly didn't expect much of a voter turn out. Why should Iraqis want anything to do with a system that's being foisted upon them? And if they were only grudgingly interested, why should they brave any risks to have something to do with it?
I was wrong.
Now you're telling me that the Iraqis who took risks to vote didn't actually want a system that's based on voting.
I'm at least somewhat convincable - but would need a lot more than your simple flat statement.

As far as my missing your point, no I don't think so. Point to some warm-fuzzy job-well-done things I have posted here. I'm pretty sure you can't even find things like "turned the corner" in any postings in this thread.

As a BTW, I'd suggest you skip using phrases like "Grow the f*ck up already." It undermines your own arguments (to the extent you are attempting to persuade - if you're just venting it of course doesn't matter a bit). If you are just venting, that's OK by me - just not something I want to waste much time on reading or responding to.

Kobuchi 02-01-2005 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark
The insurgents did try to intimidate,...hell, I should say kill the voters, but the Marines and Iraqi Army made sure it was the other way around.

Very good. The extra tight curfews and clampdown on travel worked great. I guess now the two-month emergency measures will be lifted, and we'll see what happens? What do you think will happen when normal freedoms are restored?

I was really disappointed by the resistance. They're out of control. Last Christmas, remember, some groups declared a unilateral Christmas ceasefire, and the ceasefire took (for the two days). That's civilised, and shows an organisation or at least a collective mind in these people that can be reasoned with. But for the elections I heard some say they'd let people vote, while others vowed to snipe and so forth (pure terrorism) so we got no plan, no reason, no discipline - a nonsense army.

An explanation:

Quote:

Originally Posted by a specimen
Praise be to Allah and blessings be upon His Prophet

No! There CANNOT be a coordination of effort of the
resistance. The power of the Americans is everywhere as the
power of Satan is everywhere. Any coordination would be
subject to infiltration and passing of information on to
the occupying force. The small people fighting Americans
here and there are more effective because Americans do not
know where they are going to be or when they may be there.
Allah will have the way made that all efforts come
togeather, not man.

The resistance has a lot of bad apples in its midst, and with that policy above it's not just a case of bad apples but a bad barrel, that permits rotten apples.

The resistance fighters know very well Iraqis had to register as voters when collecting their food ration cards, last month. And of course when Allawi says you're either for democracy or you're on the side of the terrorists, and he knows who registered and who did not, people will be doubly apprehensive. That some resistance leaders and even politicians could then tell those people to boycott the process, it's inconsiderate. Then voting day again people have to go to the polls to pick up their monthly ration. Nearly all Iraqis have depended on rations since sanctions, and as rations are to be phased out soon we can imagine the first to go might be those people who didn't pick up their ration cards on January 30th. Some are saying they'll kill you if you go... well that's terrorism, and as a father I think I would go anyway. Very disappointed in the resistance. Leave bread alone.

Quote:

Originally Posted by nexxo
This is just a Kodak moment

To Bush it is. He puts on a brave face and says this is really what he planned all along. But check the timeline of foreign meddling in Iraq's politics and you'll see the Americans got dragged along this path and not without some low kicks like ordering the routine census halted. The real hand behind this election is some reclusive old Iranian who lives in a Najaf alley, Ayatollah Sistani. His fatwah that the constitution can only be written by the elected (not US-picked assembly), prevailed. His fatwah against the next US plan for indirect, US-vetted, "caucus" elections, also prevailed. When there was a lull in progress, the Ayatollah asked all good Shiites to show their numbers, and they prevailed. And when the professional stall-guy Bremer tried to sink Iraqi democracy into a bureaucratic, internationalised, UN-commissioned process, Sistani went direct to Kofi Annan and said he wanted elections and no more games. Now all good Shiites have voted of course, and for Sistani's slate, because this hermit who refuses to meet with the occupiers (they're unclean) issued another fatwah that Iraqis must vote. The Shiites prevailed. Bush may put on a brave face for the cameras, but it won't be his portrait mounted on every wall in Basra, where the moment counts.

Iraqis still have a long struggle ahead, and if all goes well Americans will puff up and call it their victory even as the last soldier boards the last helicopter over the vanishing Green Zone. Warfare is about making the enemy do what you want.

Quote:

Originally Posted by nexxo
Some of the players may have changed, but it's still the same game played over the lives and corpses of innocent people.

True. All hands play divide and conquer, and only the Kurds are wise to that... among themselves that is! We'll see the US trying harder now to shift attacks on their own forces to Iraqis fighting each other. Ultimately Iraqis would take all the casualties, and Americans only shell from their hideouts or bomb from safe altitude. Then the beleaguered Iraqi government will "invite" Americans to stay and help, year after year, and the US will "help" on certain conditions. Pork barrel & economic serfdom. Keep euro out of oil. That would be a nice arrangement for the American people, ugly as it is, it would be in American interests. But I think something will scuttle that plan.

nexxo 02-01-2005 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobkoure
How do you know this? I'm pretty skeptical of the war, and frankly didn't expect much of a voter turn out. Why should Iraqis want anything to do with a system that's being foisted upon them? And if they were only grudgingly interested, why should they brave any risks to have something to do with it?
I was wrong.
Now you're telling me that the Iraqis who took risks to vote didn't actually want a system that's based on voting.

That is not what I am saying at all. I explained in my previous post why they are voting. They have lost and suffered too much to have to think that it was all for nothing. That thought would be unbearable. So they want to believe in this process. They want to hope. And any glimpse, any straw will do when you are desperate. I mean, what have they got left to lose, right?

How do I know this? I make a living out of analysing, explaining and predicting human behaviour, particularly where it concerns trauma, loss and grief. You could say it's an informed judgement. So far I have not been wrong yet.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobkoure
As far as my missing your point, no I don't think so. Point to some warm-fuzzy job-well-done things I have posted here. I'm pretty sure you can't even find things like "turned the corner" in any postings in this thread.

I was talking about the tone of the recent posts in general, not yours in particular.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobkoure
As a BTW, I'd suggest you skip using phrases like "Grow the f*ck up already." It undermines your own arguments (to the extent you are attempting to persuade - if you're just venting it of course doesn't matter a bit). If you are just venting, that's OK by me - just not something I want to waste much time on reading or responding to.

Yes, I was expressing my frustration, but that was two posts ago. You don't have to respond to it. Just let it go, dude...

Lothar5150 02-01-2005 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unregistered
......but we have a history of abandoning surrogate fighters, Bay of Pigs anyone

Some of my relatives got screwed on that beach, you roped me into that one Bill :dome: ....I agree with you and it is sin upon our heads that we did this all though the cold war. It was refreshing to hear that the President had a "come to Jesus moment" about our past foreign policy actions. I think this president is less a politician and more a leader and not apt to change with the blowing winds of opinion polls. I'm with you I don’t agree with much of his religious policies and some of his economics are all wrong but he is not a hypocrite about supporting democracy.

Kobuchi...you are small man 卑劣な小びと性交あなた自身は行く

Kobuchi 02-02-2005 05:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lothar5150
卑劣な小びと性交あなた自身は行く

You feel dumping that in another people's language makes it OK.

Lothar5150 02-02-2005 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kobuchi
You feel dumping that in another people's language makes it OK.

他の自由のための彼らの生命を与える海兵隊員についてのうそを広める卑劣な小とのための適切な応答 それを経験したが、ちょうど臆病者であるように戦闘述べている

Kobuchi 02-02-2005 02:54 PM

How I define cowardice, or bravery. Your tactic now illustrates cowardice, not to say it isn't effective. Why don't you come out and post openly, that would be brave... :p ;)

You seem not to accept that in war, cowardice wins. Modern forces have institutionalised and perfected cowardice so completely that Marines like yourself wouldn't make the connection even camouflaged and slinking on your bellies under starlight for the chance to shoot an enemy in the spine. You'd just think well that's not especially brave, but it worked, and think no more in that uncomfortable direction.

I'm not defending or attacking cowardice on moral grounds. There's a muddle you'll have to work out or rationalise on your own, or not, it's not my problem. It's easy for me because I'm a neutral observer. If I rate some act by any warring party against another cowardly or brave I mean was it effective not was it ethical - in war these things rarely coincide.

Lothar5150 02-02-2005 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kobuchi
How I define cowardice, or bravery. Your tactic now illustrates cowardice, not to say it isn't effective. Why don't you come out and post openly, that would be brave... :p ;)

You seem not to accept that in war, cowardice wins. Modern forces have institutionalised and perfected cowardice so completely that Marines like yourself wouldn't make the connection even camouflaged and slinking on your bellies under starlight for the chance to shoot an enemy in the spine. You'd just think well that's not especially brave, but it worked, and think no more in that uncomfortable direction.

I'm not defending or attacking cowardice on moral grounds. There's a muddle you'll have to work out or rationalise on your own, or not, it's not my problem. It's easy for me because I'm a neutral observer. If I rate some act by any warring party against another cowardly or brave I mean was it effective not was it ethical - in war these things rarely coincide.

Zurui chibi, have you ever been in combat?

Kobuchi 02-02-2005 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lothar5150
have you ever been in combat?

As in fighting on roughly equal terms? Symmetrical combat against a comparable force? No. I wouldn't fight that way with weapons (besides hockey sticks :D ). That's just gambling with lives, and I sincerely hope you're never sent as a Marine on a penny-toss operation. If you're talking about war then what is this, WWI? You know what happens to guys in trenches ready to die for their country. There's your bravery.

Have you been trained to shoot a guy without first revealing your position? Ever seen a howitzer?

Is it so hard to grasp that IEDs are effective because they're cowardly?

If you don't get it, I'm sorry for the baggage.

Lothar5150 02-02-2005 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kobuchi
As in fighting on roughly equal terms? Symmetrical combat against a comparable force? No. I wouldn't fight that way with weapons (besides hockey sticks :D ). That's just gambling with lives, and I sincerely hope you're never sent as a Marine on a penny-toss operation. If you're talking about war then what is this, WWI? You know what happens to guys in trenches ready to die for their country. There's your bravery.

Have you been trained to shoot a guy without first revealing your position? Ever seen a howitzer?

Is it so hard to grasp that IEDs are effective because they're cowardly?

If you don't get it, I'm sorry for the baggage.

Zurui chibi, then your answer is no you haven't been in combat. I am a combat veteran. You’re the one who just doesn't get it.

Kobuchi 02-03-2005 01:16 AM

It was a mystical experience that elevates you beyond debate, yet empowers you to foulmouth people on the internet. I do hope you can talk about this with your old mates. We've both said too much of one thing or another. Cheers.

Lothar5150 02-03-2005 02:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kobuchi
It was a mystical experience that elevates you beyond debate, yet empowers you to foulmouth people on the internet. I do hope you can talk about this with your old mates. We've both said too much of one thing or another. Cheers.

Beyond debate with you Zurui chibi. Unlike you, others may have disagreed with policies but are able to see that some very positive.... historic things have evolved from it. Further more they respect the people who ensure their freedoms despite political policy. Zurui chibi, yes I foul mouth you, not people....specifically you and you have earned it. Just remember that everyday you draw breath as a free man some person better than yourself puts their life in harms way to ensure your freedoms.

Kobuchi 02-03-2005 04:34 AM

Me "specifically" me, that's too creepy for belief. You may think I take your behaviour personally if you like.

BillA 02-03-2005 10:39 AM

I wondered how long it would take for the constant defamation, slander, and depreciation to have an effect, your patience L5 has been amazing

our Zurui chibi has had a very easy time of it, dishing out great helpings of scorn and abuse while being countered in a rational manner

is time to say what I think of you, very small Japanese pos ?
yes
well dick head, I speak clearly in English
that you have no honor is a personal thing, except we know that your race has no honor
I cite WWII as the example, and the 50 years since then as proof of your race's refusal to accept responsibility
so you are but one spec in an ocean of shit, nothing unique about a racist

and so it is not surprising that one of your type would argue over the concept of helping others as that is not your mindset
nor is it surprising that you would find the US to be your personal Great Satan, 2 bombs stopped your parade cold

I too hope that your life will provide you with the opportunity to understand yourself,
a physical and spiritual 'trial by fire' so you can shit you pants and scream like a female for succor
in my dreams I will ignore you; and your children for their heads will be full of shit like yours - they are worth nothing

please do understand what you are worth,
you are unable to pay your debt to the US for giving YOU the freedom (the end of WWII) you would keep from others
so you hide where you are safe, and avoid at all costs the consequences of your actions
scumbag is too noble for your ilk,
and I would not defame women by calling you a douche bag

and Thank JoeK for the ignore list

Joe 02-03-2005 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mx-6*
... I will do anything within my power to hunt you out ...

Uhh... yeh....

mx-6* you may not realize this but thats a felony to say stuff like that. Maybe you should see a shrink or something... you seem to have rattled a few bolts loose over time.

Personally I think - anyone who resorts to threats of physical violence behind a keyboard is no better than the person he is calling a coward.

Keep this stupid shit up in here and this thread goes away.

BillA 02-03-2005 10:58 AM

Joe - I think you should delete mx6's post

Joe 02-03-2005 11:02 AM

its gone

Doh who put the 10 character limit here ;)

mx-6* 02-03-2005 11:10 AM

Well at least you guys are good at letting one side post its BS.

GJ!

mx-6* 02-03-2005 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe
Uhh... yeh....

mx-6* you may not realize this but thats a felony to say stuff like that. Maybe you should see a shrink or something... you seem to have rattled a few bolts loose over time.

Personally I think - anyone who resorts to threats of physical violence behind a keyboard is no better than the person he is calling a coward.

Keep this stupid shit up in here and this thread goes away.


BTW its not a felony.

A clue may be needed here.

BillA 02-03-2005 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mx-6*
Well at least you guys are good at letting one side post its BS.

GJ!

a terroristic threat WILL get YOU jail time

got another cute post ?
-> you are looking at handcuffs

Joe 02-03-2005 11:19 AM

Yeh I work for the State Attorneys office for WI, and yes Post 9/11 threats like that are Felony's.

Also he posted BS, you posted a threat, theres a clear difference.

mx-6* 02-03-2005 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unregistered
a terroristic threat WILL get YOU jail time

got another cute post ?
-> you are looking at handcuffs

Hey dumbass, there was no terrorist threat from me but you have to know that is how those of us who are in the actual deal are feeling.

If you cant stand the heat then dont start fires in the kitchen on purpose. If your a full time wuss then wear a barney hat as an avatar.

Joe 02-03-2005 11:22 AM

How is telling someone you are going to hunt them down and kill them, their families, and anyone who socializes with them not a terroristic threat?

Joe 02-03-2005 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mx-6*
but you have to know that is how those of us who are in the actual deal are feeling.


What actual deal? your in Japan... are we still at war with them or something?

BillA 02-03-2005 11:28 AM

if the little Japanese pos files a complaint, I will be a wittiness
methinks you have an ugly lesson in the pipeline

a dumbass eh ?
shit, you are a bigger fool than the Zurui chibi
now you going to go after me too ?
your balls better be way bigger than your brains, duh
homicide is ok as long as legally justified, 'you are making me feel afraid for my personal safety'
you just crossed a tripwire
pay attention kiddo


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(C) 2005 ProCooling.com
If we in some way offend you, insult you or your people, screw your mom, beat up your dad, or poop on your porch... we're sorry... we were probably really drunk...
Oh and dont steal our content bitches! Don't give us a reason to pee in your open car window this summer...