MCW-6000 or MCW-6002?
I've been reading procooling's review of the MCW-6002 and it was concluded that the MCW-6000 (3/8") actually performs better than the MCW-6002 (1/2") at flow rates of 1.5GPM and above, so basically the 3/8" version performs better when paired with a powerful pump like the MCP650.
I'm going to be using the MCP650 in my setup, but I'm also going to have a Fedco 2-342, a chipset waterblock (MCW20), and a GPU waterblock (MCW50) as well as the CPU block. I was wondering if all this added to the loop would decrease the waterflow below 1.5GPM, to the point where it would actually be better to go with the MCW6002 instead of the MCW6000? Everything else is still going to be 1/2". I got 1/2" adapters for both the MCW20 and MCW50. Smart move or no? |
3/8 recommended with the MCW6000
|
Well you save yourself the trouble of using larger tubing and the adaptors by using the 6000. Before 1.5GPM they're both the same, and I doubt you'll get much better than 1.5GPM if you get there at all. Let factors other than performance decide this one for you.
|
Quote:
|
I'd use whatever your pump is. Converting is a PITA, and the difference in performance is pretty insignificant.
|
The higher pressure of the 3/8" block is supposed to give marginally better performance than the 1/2". You'd need a hell of a pump to do better with 1/2" tubing. But ask Bill A. He's the source of knowledge for all things Swiftech.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(C) 2005 ProCooling.com If we in some way offend you, insult you or your people, screw your mom, beat up your dad, or poop on your porch... we're sorry... we were probably really drunk... Oh and dont steal our content bitches! Don't give us a reason to pee in your open car window this summer...