pH doing waterblock/HSF testing again? - Poll
Since pH has pretty much lost any love with doing testing, and figures no matter what he does with it, he will be torn apart. Because of the recent "flip flop" if I can use that term... of testing methodology thats been thrown around in the last couple months... I think its fair to say this whole area is in flux.
So I figure I would put up a poll to see what people think. Should pH start testing blocks again? get his rig back up and running? And if so what kind of testing would you be satisfied with? |
Re: pH doing waterblock/HSF testing again? - Poll
This poll is flawed
If everyone votes for testing with IHS-clad AMD64 it doesn't affect me. I won't do it cause I will quickly destroy the CPU And there's no poll for "pH should sit on his ass and drink beer" |
Re: pH doing waterblock/HSF testing again? - Poll
I should have noted that the IHS Clad option was there just for info, because I know you wouldnt do it. If people pick that, you can just tie it to "sit on your ass and drink beer" I guess
|
Re: pH doing waterblock/HSF testing again? - Poll
OK I vote that one then :)
|
Re: pH doing waterblock/HSF testing again? - Poll
voted socket A as thats what i use
|
Re: pH doing waterblock/HSF testing again? - Poll
picked bare core, but would be tempted am equally tempted by beer to give the poor guy a break, since knowing us we will only argue anyway.
What about if he cooled beer? |
Re: pH doing waterblock/HSF testing again? - Poll
Test =
"Big Player Making Big Money" |
Re: pH doing waterblock/HSF testing again? - Poll
Went with the first one. How is the dP thing going?
|
Re: pH doing waterblock/HSF testing again? - Poll
a sad day when I an unable to answer such a question
my views have created such confusion and dismay that I will pass on a vote/position fix the dP setup, test in any manner the results will still have to be correlated to something (no temp is "real") change source, start anew |
Re: pH doing waterblock/HSF testing again? - Poll
No clear answer here either.
I support the use of a processor, just because of the (painfully arranged) diode reader (and how the data can be used by other testers). Not entirely sure about the consistency of it all though; I'd like to see one single block (calibration block?) tested on a regular basis. I'm not invalidating the procedure, I'm just suggesting that since this is (relatively) cutting edge (i.e. unique), some kind of check might be in order. |
Re: pH doing waterblock/HSF testing again? - Poll
my confusion is the diff between measuring tempuratures from the cpu or from a TC. I always thought that the accuracy of the on-die diodes was unknown or bad, and a TC or RTD or whatever should be used to make the measurements and thus the test "scientific".
but then again everyone loved PH's testing when he measured from the athlon xp's on-die diode. of course as billa said: Quote:
|
Re: pH doing waterblock/HSF testing again? - Poll
pH did independently cal his diode
the interesting question is what that temp is wrt the allegorical 'die temp' yes it is a die temp, is it THE die temp ? (all are NOT the same) |
Re: pH doing waterblock/HSF testing again? - Poll
Quote:
(I just couldn't pass up the pun in that one.) :D |
Re: pH doing waterblock/HSF testing again? - Poll
let me get to my desk
ahh, being is |
Re: pH doing waterblock/HSF testing again? - Poll
Um Ben
In the SocketA days I always had 2 "std" waterblocks with which I tested. Any time I was forced to move things around I would (a) recal the diode reader/CPU setup (in case some slight change in the solder joints) and (b) run 2 separate wbs through a dT vs. Q testing (5 day process). THEN I could feel confident that I was getting numbers that were always comparable to previous work and so the interactive graphing thing was as free of error as was humanly possible. |
Re: pH doing waterblock/HSF testing again? - Poll
Oh good! Thanks for sharing that; it's hard to consolidate everything that you've posted already.
|
Re: pH doing waterblock/HSF testing again? - Poll
I would note that the overwhelming majority either want pH to just test, or test with an IHSless CPU.
Lets get cracking! ;) |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(C) 2005 ProCooling.com If we in some way offend you, insult you or your people, screw your mom, beat up your dad, or poop on your porch... we're sorry... we were probably really drunk... Oh and dont steal our content bitches! Don't give us a reason to pee in your open car window this summer...