Pro/Forums

Pro/Forums (http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/index.php)
-   General Liquid/Water Cooling Discussion (http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   Pump Selection Sanity Check (http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/showthread.php?t=12775)

effnish 02-07-2006 07:10 PM

Pump Selection Sanity Check
 
I'm building a new setup for my A64 3000+ and I'm still trying to nail down which pump to get. I've already decided on a 12v pump and I'm building the system more around quiet cooling than absolute performance. With that in mind I ran a few numbers to find out what the performance trade-offs were for each of 3 pumps. This is my first attempt at the exercise so let me know if you see anything blatently wrong.

Based on what I calculated no pump is a bad choice but I'm leaning towards the CSP-Mag for Price, quietness, and performance

Equipment list so far:
BIP III
Apogee
MCW60

Using the numbers I could find for the parts above, I did the analysis to see what my expected Water-Air temp delta would be for a: MCP350, MCP655 (#1-#5 setting), and CSP-Mag.

System resistance curve fit: PSI Drop = 0.3324x3 - 0.21x2 + 2.1156x - 0.704 where x is the flow rate in GPM. Number includes an additional 10% resistance for tubing

Rough estimate of 100W for the CPU and 50W for the GPU.

MCP350: 1.33 GPM, .037 C/W CPU, .039 C/W GPU, .032 C/W BIP III, 8W pump
CSP-MAG: 1.07 GPM, .039 C/W CPU, .040 C/W GPU, .034 C/W BIP III, 8W pump
MCP655 #5: 1.61 GPM, .036 C/W CPU, .038 C/W GPU, .031 C/W BIPIII, 15W pump
MCP655 #4: 1.41 GPM, .037 C/W CPU, .038 C/W GPU, .032 C/W BIPIII, 14W pump
MCP655 #3: 1.15 GPM, .039 C/W CPU, .039 C/W GPU, .033 C/W BIPIII, 6.5W pump
MCP655 #2: 0.89 GPM, .042 C/W CPU, .042 C/W GPU, .035 C/W BIPIII, 4W pump
MCP655 #1: 0.66 GPM, .046 C/W CPU, .046 C/W GPU, .036 C/W BIPIII, 2.5W pump

http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f2.../TempDelta.jpg

bigben2k 02-07-2006 07:23 PM

Re: Pump Selection Sanity Check
 
Interesting. Nice work!

Long Haired Git 02-07-2006 09:05 PM

Re: Pump Selection Sanity Check
 
Check out the review where they measure how much heat dump each pump does.

Where did you get the data for the BIP three?

My approximator is being updated as we speak...
Will post URL soon.

Dryadsoul 02-07-2006 09:14 PM

Re: Pump Selection Sanity Check
 
Great JoB! I see your data confirms my choice of the Laing D5 as fair one then!
Thanks and quiet wasn't my concern.

effnish 02-08-2006 10:00 PM

Re: Pump Selection Sanity Check
 
I pulled the BIPIII numbers off of the first page of the "How much Pump is enough" post. The numbers are actually for a thermochill 120.3 but they work in a pinch.

My pump heat dump numbers probably aren't too acurate as I did them last and wasn't concentrating due to my wife talking trash about me being a nerd.

ElMoIsEviL 02-11-2006 10:38 AM

Re: Pump Selection Sanity Check
 
Courtesy of Coolercases.co.uk

Eheim 1046
1046 = 6 LPM
(didn't have correct fittings to carry on with this one)


Eheim 1048
1048 = 8.7 LPM
1048 + TDX (nozzle1) = 5.9 LPM
1048 + TDX + Maze4 GPU = 5.2 LPM
1048 + TDX + Maze4 Chipset = 5.4 LPM
1048 + TDX + Maze4 GPU + Maze4 Chipset = 4.7 LPM
1048 + TDX + EVO1 = 4.3 LPM
1048 + RBX (nozzle1) = 5 LPM
1048 + White Water = 5.4 LPM


Eheim 1250
1250 = 16.4 LPM
1250 + TDX (nozzle1) = 8.3 LPM
1250 + TDX + Maze GPU = 6.9 LPM
1250 + TDX + Maze4 Chipset = 7.2 LPM
1250 + TDX + Maze4 GPU + Maze4 Chipset = 6.3 LPM
1250 + TDX + EVO1 = 3.15 LPM
1250 + RBX (nozzle1) = 6.9 LPM
1250 + White Water = 7.6 LPM
1250 + Maze4 (copper top) = 11.1 LPM
1250 + Maze3 = 8.7 LPM


Eheim 1260
1260 = 18.9 LPM
1260 + TDX (nozzle1) = 12.6 LPM
1260 + TDX + Maze4 GPU = 8.8 LPM
1260 + TDX + Maze4 Chipset = 9.7 LPM
1260 + TDX + Maze4 GPU + Maze4 Chipset = 8.9 LPM
1260 + TDX + EVO1 = 4.5 LPM
1260 + TDX + RBX (nozzle1) = 9.5 LPM
1260 + TDX + White Water = 10.5 LPM


Laing D4
Laing D4 = 16.4 LPM
Laing D4 + TDX (nozzle1) = 9.5 LPM
Laing D4 + TDX + Maze4 GPU = 8.4 LPM
Laing D4 + TDX + Maze4 Chipset = 8.9 LPM
Laing D4 + TDX + Maze4 GPU + Maze4 Chipset = 7.8 LPM
Laing D4 + TDX + EVO1 = 4.2 LPM
Laing D4 + TDX + RBX (nozzle1) = 8.4 LPM
Laing D4 + TDX + White Water = 9.2 LPM


C-system Pump (single)
C-system = 5.5 LPM
C-system + TDX (nozzle1) = 4.7 LPM
C-system + TDX + Maze4 Chipset = 4.4 LPM
C-system + TDX + Maze4 Chipset + Maze4 GPU = 3.9 LPM


C-system Pump (2 Pumps)
2x C-system = 8.6 LPM
2x C-system + TDX (nozzle1) = 5.8 LPM
2x C-system + TDX + Maze4 Chipset = 5.2 LPM
2x C-system + TDX + Maze4 Chipset + Maze4 GPU = 4.7 LPM


Laing DDC-12v (test carried out with 3/8" to 1/2" step up barbs)
Laing DDC = 7.2 LPM
Laing DDC + TDX (nozzle1) = 6.3 LPM
Laing DDC + TDX + Maze4 Chipset = 6.0 LPM


Laing DDC-12v (test carried out with modded 1/2" inlet )
Laing DDC = 12.2 LPM
Laing DDC + TDX (nozzle1) = 9.7 LPM
Laing DDC + TDX + Maze4 Chipset = 8.6 LPM

Note: Alphacool has a new revision of the pump out ( Lang DDC-1 Plus) which again has an increased flow rate that once arrives will be tested in the same manner. (cheers Leeum)

Amendment 25/01/06
Laing DDC-1Plus With Alphacool Plexi Top ½” Barbs (side mount inlet & outlet)
Laing DDC-1Plus = 9.7 LPM
Laing DDC-1Plus + TDX (nozzle1) = 8.4 LPM

Laing DDC-1Plus With Alphacool Plexi Top ½” Barbs (top mount inlet - side mount outlet)
Laing DDC-1Plus = 14.5 LPM
Laing DDC-1Plus + TDX (nozzle1) = 10.5 LPM

Added 29/01/06
Laing DDC-1Plus With Alphacool Plexi Top ½” Barbs (top mount inlet - side mount outlet)
Laing DDC-1Plus + NV-78 = 11.5 LPM
Laing DDC-1Plus + NV-78 + TDX (nozzle1) = 9.2 LPM

Laing DDC-1Plus + Alphacool NVXP-3 6800/7800 = 6.9 LPM
Laing DDC-1Plus + Alphacool NVXP-3 6800/7800 + TDX (nozzle1) = 6.9 LPM

Laing D5
Laing D5 (set @ no 5) = 16.4 LPM
Laing D5 (set @ no 1) = 4.4 LPM


Here's a look at the pumps used which gives a good insight into physical size.......from left to right

Eheim 1260>>>Eheim 1250>>>Eheim 1048>>>Eheim 1046>>>Laing D4
http://www.coolercases.co.uk/images/...heim_range.jpg

Here's a Laing D4 Pump along side the tiny Laing DDC-12v
http://www.coolercases.co.uk/images/Misc/d4_ddc.jpg

This is the new Laing D5 which is exactly the same physical size and shape to the Laing D4 apart from offering an inbuilt rheostat to control flow rates and being black in colour.
Set on No5 (highest setting) the pump is very very quite though still gives a little noise where as set on No1 (lowest setting) i would say the pump is virtually silent.
Set on No4 it would seem noise level to be similar to the Laing DDC
http://www.coolercases.co.uk/images/..._den/dd_d5.jpg

And one of the D5 Rheostat
http://www.coolercases.co.uk/images/...d5_control.jpg

Long Haired Git 02-12-2006 06:29 PM

Re: Pump Selection Sanity Check
 
Cheers ElMoIsEviL !!!!

Whilst I prefer the pump review from that French site as it included watts added to the coolant, I can use these figures to derive PQ charts for the Maze4 chipset and GPU coolers.
Which will have to do until I can convince RoboTech to do a proper test of them.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(C) 2005 ProCooling.com
If we in some way offend you, insult you or your people, screw your mom, beat up your dad, or poop on your porch... we're sorry... we were probably really drunk...
Oh and dont steal our content bitches! Don't give us a reason to pee in your open car window this summer...