pent3 @ 1842Mhz??
 

whahahaha... this guy likes photoshop http://www.procooling.com/ubb/smile.gif http://www.procooling.com/ubb/smile.gif http://www.procooling.com/ubb/smile.gif http://www.procooling.com/ubb/smile.gif

http://leden.tref.nl/~brminnee/hoax.jpg

http://leden.tref.nl/~brminnee/hoax2.jpg


anybody heard of PC250 sdram??

[This message has been edited by Freakyfrank (edited 02-17-2001).]

too bad he removed his website..

but he was showing off bout it at a local forum..

and i couldnt resist sharing it ..
he still claimt its real!!

damn i hate such guys!! (reminding me of icrontic or wathever)

------------------
OC'ing is my middlename

That dude is an amtuer, I can get my Pentium III 933 up to 2047mhz. :-)

I'm sorry, but i doubt that is real. 289mhz front side bus? that's just ludicrous. I saw an article on how u can fake the system and it will report bogus benchmarks, They had one at 36,000mhz. It looks pretty real too because it isn't a marked up pic.

36GHZ would be cool with my GeForce90

------------------
Blah Blah Blah
Overclocked Dual PIII 933
sitting on a VP6 mobo featuring liquid intercooling.
AIM[SN]: PhreeNET

What? only 36Ghz? pussy

I got a 12 way 1Thz GF58Ultra SLI set http://www.procooling.com/ubb/smile.gif

hehehehe
ok that was a bit of a stretch...

he probably didn't edit that in photoshop. . .more than likely the benchmarking program is real.

interesting fact: I'm sure many of you know about the CS-speed hack right? well did you know that it also fools benchmarking proggies into showing you computer to be faster than it really is? heh, give it a shot sometime. . .kinda funny.

fact in effect: here's my little comp it's a pIII 600, I'm only using a standard HSF that intel supplied.
http://cryonosis.8m.com/image.htm
sry - my server doen't allow direct linking

pretty sweet eh? Intel must make some wicked HSF's or I am just way to cool. . .

------------------
©××××ק===============
»»»»»»»»Cryonosis«««««««««
©××××ק===============
moderator for Broken Pixel http://www.brokenpixel.com
webmaster of the Kingdom of Ys http://cryonosis.8m.com

[This message has been edited by Cryonosis (edited 03-09-2001).]

so if u see that the FSB is really outta range, the benchmark-result is fake..

well, there's a problem with that. . .see you don't HAVE to set up an extreme overclock, you can just tweak it up a hair higher than normal. It would be a great way to win an overclockers' contest. . .hell you could use practically any benchmarking proggy they give you and you could display the same results. ever since that cheat was released you now can't apply to much trust to ANY claims at overclocking.

------------------
©××××ק===============
»»»»»»»»Cryonosis«««««««««
©××××ק===============
moderator for Broken Pixel http://www.brokenpixel.com
webmaster of the Kingdom of Ys http://cryonosis.8m.com

here, I just put another picture on that page that I linked to earlier. It's shows my 600 running at a rather reasonable, and believable, speed. except there's one thing wrong. . .I haven't overclocked anything. my 600 is still running with a stock HSF with with no modifcations of anykind. . .it's a fraudulant overclock. and it took me about 1min to do.

------------------
©××××ק===============
»»»»»»»»Cryonosis«««««««««
©××××ק===============
moderator for Broken Pixel http://www.brokenpixel.com
webmaster of the Kingdom of Ys http://cryonosis.8m.com

the guys who discovered that hack did a good job..

WCPUID... oke..

but sisoft sandra? I don't understand.. cause there has to be some real benchmarking involved..
or the timing is screwed up.

and Q3 scores, what about that?

so then it has to be a mixture of fooling the benchsprogs to read the false fsb-settings and make the timing run slower.

Q: if u oc ur comp to a certain fsb, and u compare the results to a normal fsb with that hack.. is there any difference??

gimme that hack!! http://www.procooling.com/ubb/smile.gif

from now on i only believe the photoshots of a bios-startupscreen.

EVERYONE of the will fool you, even quake3 will give you a fraudulent overclock. IT's all because of how this benchmark works. What it does is make your computer think a second is longer than it really is.

so when your computer does any kind of benchmarking it will think that it did something like two seconds worth of work in one second. basically it's the timing that screwed up. Effectivly making your computer appear to be twice as fast as it really is.

best part about the hack is that I can run the benchmark with you staring over my shoulder and fool you in person. the hack is incredibly devious and just needs someone to make a more refined version for overclockers.

since it runs within windows bios screenshots should still be legit. . .but some photoshopping on that will make it lie. so a site can give a ton of different benchmarkings all making you think that they got a processor to a point that they really could never have.

------------------
©××××ק===============
»»»»»»»»Cryonosis«««««««««
©××××ק===============
moderator for Broken Pixel http://www.brokenpixel.com
webmaster of the Kingdom of Ys http://cryonosis.8m.com

THAT SUX!!

hope the benchmarks will find a solution FAST..