Pro/Forums

Pro/Forums (http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/index.php)
-   General Liquid/Water Cooling Discussion (http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   My new water block, need help !!! (http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/showthread.php?t=675)

morphling1 12-25-2001 03:54 PM

My new water block, need help !!!
 
Hi, after some time , I finaly made my new water block. It's made from Al (I was gonna made it from Cu, but it was too much trouble, 2.5mm milling bit broke to often, and inner wall colapse when milling). But there seems to be problem with this block, it just don't perform as good as I wanted. One problem could be to thin bottom of 2mm so the heat couldn't spread around the block.Can Al block with large surface area like this outperform Cu block. Please I need good sugestions.

Here are the pics.
http://www2.arnes.si/~mlivak/spiral2.JPG
http://www2.arnes.si/~mlivak/spiralni%20blok%202.JPG
http://www2.arnes.si/~mlivak/spiraln...20open%201.JPG

http://www2.arnes.si/~mlivak/spiralni%20blok%20top.JPG

pHaestus 12-25-2001 10:23 PM

First of all, that is some top notch machining. As for the performance, it seems to me that the channels closest to the input line have the sharpest angle (over 90 degrees) and I would be concerned that the water wasn't flowing very much right around the center of the block. This is where the bulk of the heat is too, so that could be a bad thing for heat transfer if the water flows preferentially around the outside. That is just a guess of course...

WebMasta33 12-26-2001 12:24 AM

Wow. That's awsome. Where/how did you get that machined?

morphling1 12-26-2001 04:19 AM

Water flow was surprisingly good. I tested the block with 590 l/h pump, which dropped flow to 490 l/h with 50 cm 1/2" ID tube, then to 340 l/h thrue this block, I also tested my older 5*5cm Cu cross drilled (10mm ID S shapped chanell) block which dropped to 250 l/h. So flow is not the problem.

As for making of this block, I made 3d model and get NC code with ProEngineer, then with a help of a friend with CNC Cincinnati mill, he post prosess this code for his machine and made it. We'll probably make few more prototypes with thicker base, and if it perform good,and some of you are interested, we could make a small series.A complete block with 4 spring, bolts and everything to put this block on a socketA mb, wouldn't cost more than 50$. I could send a sample to Joe for independent test. Stop me if I'm not allowed to do that.

Malchira 12-26-2001 07:06 AM

Not to be intentionally contrary, but are you sure your pump might not be a factor? If my conversion utility is correct, 590l/h is only 150 U.S. gallons per hour, which isn't exactly a powerhouse pump, especially for use with a fairly restrictive design.

Just a thought.

morphling1 12-26-2001 07:59 AM

No, no 590 l/h pump was used only for flow testing through the block. In my case I've got Eheim 1250 badboy, see my old pic. http://www2.arnes.si/~mlivak/Cel%20sistem.jpg .

futRtrubL 12-27-2001 09:01 PM

What I think pHaestus was getting at wasn't overall flow. You have three channels rinning in the spiral, what he was getting at, and I agree, is that more water will be flowing through the outer channel because the inner ones have tighter bends. This could be why you are getting high flow rates.

Edward

Brad 12-28-2001 02:02 AM

fut is thinking of the right idea.

in a future block it might be an idea to make the inner channel a little wider, the middle one how it is now, and the outer one a bit thinner.

newbie 12-28-2001 06:16 AM

What kind of numbers are you getting?
 
You say you aren't getting very good results - what do you mean? What's do your temp numbers look like? c/w?

Secondly, what are you comparing your numbers to? Do you have a dangerden or a nano block that's giving you better results in exactly the same config?

Having asked all that, the fact that you've got multiple flow channels means the waterflow is going to choose the path of least resistance. Water that flows into a higher resistance channel may end up stagnating and since water doesn't conduct heat well, that could create a hotspot.

One way you could diagnose the issue is measure the block's temperature with either an optical probe that remotely measures temperatures or, if you're lucky, a video camera that has an ir capable ccd. Sony used to make a camera like that that some folks used to look at women. The camera showed the heat flux, not the clothing. The camera will give you an instantaneous reading across the entire surface and tell you if you've got stagnant water inside the block.

If you've only got an optical probe, then you'll want to divide your block into a matrix and measure the temperature at each square in the matrix. Record the temp in each square on graph paper and that'll give you a numerical equivalent of the video image.

morphling1 12-28-2001 12:45 PM

Ok, the numbers, first cpu TB 1520@2.12V =120W ,100% Seti load. With this WB the temp. is 44°C (c/W=0.2), then I made another test with 2.5Cu plate bolted on the base of the WB with arctic silver between and temp dropped to 38°C (c/W=0.15) . With my old big homemade Cu WB I get 33°C (c/W=0.11).Room temp was 20°C, water temp 22°C. So the problem with WB is to thin base. I'll make few blocks with different base thickness and tested them to find optimal one.

That kind of camera would be nice, but no way I could get it.

morphling1 01-02-2002 05:29 AM

Ok, modification will be made,also Cu version will bi made, first results here in 3 weeks.
See ya

newbie 01-02-2002 10:48 AM

Morphling, you might learn more if you change one variable at a time. If you think the problem with your wb is that it has too thin a base and it is made of copper, modify one parameter and rebuild.

By changing both parameters at the same time, you might end up with a better block in one shot but you won't know why it's a better block.

morphling1 01-02-2002 11:40 AM

Ok, my last post before I go.Of course I'll change only one parameter at a time. I will make AL ver. with thicker base and another Cu one ,just because I wanna see the real difference between AL & Cu, but for changing parameters I'm focused on AL block for now.

Hallis 01-02-2002 05:17 PM

Beautifull design.

Brad 01-02-2002 06:29 PM

you'd probably want to do most of that sort of thing in Al, simply cause of cost as well as how easy it is to work with

Overlag 01-03-2002 08:28 AM

how about milling it so the cap (the top atm) to the whole thing is what contacts the core, and make this copper,kinda like the swiftech design?

Brad 01-03-2002 04:52 PM

cause then the fins wouldn't be part of the same piece of copper, the only piece of copper doing anything would be the flat bottom

xoLiVeRx 01-08-2002 02:15 PM

yo morphling could u tell me where i can order those quick release couplings? for 1/2 tubing, i would greatly appriciate it!

oLiVeR

morphling1 01-11-2002 04:11 AM

I bought them in local hardware shop, they have them in any shop that sells garden equipment (Gardena, my was made by Claber...)

CptnDipshit 01-15-2002 06:18 PM

Will you post any measurements and/or materials list to make this when your finished. Maybe a downloadable cad file. I have a friend that works at a machine shop and said he's slow a lot and would make one for me when he has time. I understand if you don't want to, it's your design and all.

Thanks

Brad 01-15-2002 06:40 PM

it isn't too hard to design and make your own you know, plenty of people do it all the time

CptnDipshit 01-15-2002 09:45 PM

Yea, I know. I just relly like hi design. As far as what i would be able to make, it would probably be just a straight through channel. I would like to make my own (still saving for a mill)

Cyco-Dude 02-16-2002 08:39 PM

cool...
 
that sir, is a nice lookin block! a copper one would be sweet...

have you checked out Becooling's new CuSil WB? the desogns in the two block look...very similar in some aspects.

Brad 02-17-2002 01:53 AM

pity cusil is a sham, otherwise it is a seriously nice block

ksw 02-27-2002 12:51 PM

i want results for the CuWB!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(C) 2005 ProCooling.com
If we in some way offend you, insult you or your people, screw your mom, beat up your dad, or poop on your porch... we're sorry... we were probably really drunk...
Oh and dont steal our content bitches! Don't give us a reason to pee in your open car window this summer...