HAL-9000 |
06-08-2004 10:42 AM |
A 226 watt pelt at optiumum would beat it
Quote:
Originally Posted by gone_fishin
Interesting observation. At a mere 40 watts more, the graph shows 0C die temp. The interesting part is the packaging size. True a 240 watt pelt has the potential to keep a die the same temp, but only if the hot side is cooled sufficiently by a watercooling loop. IMO, the additional power and footprint of that loop must be considered along with the pelt for a more fair comparison. Also, a pelt is still considered a dangerous option, fire hazard etc, unless some very extensive failsafes were built into the system. Hard to imagine millions of dollars in servers with 200+ watt pelts on them.
Also, this seems to have been researched through Intel's IA64 department, which was a while ago. Nothing seems to have come of it but that could very well just be legal issues.
|
Remember the heat source they speak of is only 100 watts, thats a lot of power to cool 100 watts to 50C or even zero. Also, there must be a way to remove the heat from ambient on the PCT just as with the peltier. still air can't radiate away all that heat from one small point.
All these systems share one trait: they somehow move heat across the device to the other side of the device using energy. Sterlings and this PCT do it mechanically, while a pelt does it using electricity. But its still the same principle for all three.
|