Pro/Forums

Pro/Forums (http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/index.php)
-   General Liquid/Water Cooling Discussion (http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   DigiDoc 5 - Accurate temps? (http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/showthread.php?t=9766)

JoeKamel 06-09-2004 06:55 AM

DigiDoc 5 - Accurate temps?
 
Hey, just a question about the DigiDoc 5's. They seem to use the same type of thermistors as are on some boards (the type that just seem to stick up and touch the underside of the chips, and I've read in many posts on here that the thermistors on boards aren't accurate. So my question is how accurate are they exactly? Also, they ship with both the flat and bulb type thermistors and was wondering if either was more accurate than the other.

pHaestus 06-09-2004 10:10 AM

Guaranteed +/-3C I believe. Repeatability is of course better as long as you don't have to move the probe around every time to measure your temps.

Joe 06-09-2004 10:33 AM

theve shown some weirdness around strong emf's (electro magnetic fields) like those given off from the transformers for CCFL's and Neon's. Temps seem to wander at times around those.

pHaestus 06-09-2004 10:52 AM

The flat probes don't seem to be too robust either. I know I never felt very comfortable that the reading wasn't getting affected by the bending of the flat probes. You could see them drift away from the other flat probe used for air measurements over time if you put one on CPU and one near fan intake. What I mean is that you might find at day 1 that the two probes when taped together so they were in contact w/ one another would read say 0.2C apart. After a few weeks of using one of those probes on the side of a CPU for heatsink testing and moving it around, maybe they were 0.8C apart or maybe 0.2C apart still but in the opposite direction. Could just be native repeatability or could be affected by manipulating the wires I dunno.

superart 06-09-2004 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe
theve shown some weirdness around strong emf's (electro magnetic fields) like those given off from the transformers for CCFL's and Neon's. Temps seem to wander at times around those.

could this be because the EMF induces a a current, thus changing the voltage going through the wire, thus making the controler think that the resistance of the thermister is diferent than it actually is, thus reporting the temperature inacurately?


...thus showing that i like the word "thus" and that I often use runon sentences, thus demonstrating my lack of proficiency in the use of propper english :D

JoeKamel 06-09-2004 06:27 PM

Thanks for the info guys. I don't change my setups too often, I usually just buy a new one every three to four years so I'm not too worried then about fragility of the thermistors. Anyway, I just wanted to say thanks for the 411.

RoboTech 06-09-2004 08:44 PM

And they won't read below freezing... :(
Here are my test results when I reviewed the DD5+

http://www.systemcooling.com/images/...us/Image20.gif

DigiDoc 5+ Temp probe testing...

pHaestus 06-09-2004 11:43 PM

Does that hold for a wide temperature range though RoboTech? My guess would be no just from my playing with thermistors.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(C) 2005 ProCooling.com
If we in some way offend you, insult you or your people, screw your mom, beat up your dad, or poop on your porch... we're sorry... we were probably really drunk...
Oh and dont steal our content bitches! Don't give us a reason to pee in your open car window this summer...