Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jmke
. . . . .
keep up the good reviewing work pH , the greatest honour I can think of is: one day receiving a thumbs up after publishing a watercooling related article @ Madshrimps.
. . . . .
|
no offense jmke, but Madshrimps has a ways to go to achieve the level of pHaestus' present work product here on procooling
nor are pHaestus' efforts unappreciated here, indeed without him I suspect procooling would atrophy quickly
you do Madshrimps no benefit by posting articles such as this one by Liquid3D:
technically ungrounded, no coherent plan, poorly executed, piss-poor documentation, pure BS analysis, and writing so bad it causes alternate cringing and laughter
-> if you have a technical writer, and they have no peers that they can cajole into reviewing their work; then you can conclude that your writer is only a wannabe - and not the real thing
- do understand that there are 2 discreet issues here:
1) the physical testing plan and execution, and the organization and analysis of the data, and
2) the expository writing to present the experiment and describe the results
if you aspire to having a 'good' technical website then you will have to decline posting this kind of "pomposity and unintelligibility"
(thanks Groth, succinctly put)