Thank you for your civil comments, their (this time it's correct?) so much easier to ingest. I struggle with this issue of wanting to say so much, and say it concisely. Sometimes the two contradict. Of course it's hurtful when someone says the review is "un-readable." I put a concerted effort into recording temps with each nozzle installed, each nozzle 's ability to maintain a constant temp under overcloked conditions, default conditions, under LOAD and IDLE.
I tried to compare the results, and to theorize based upon them. I endeavored to explain the the designer's intent, and without actually speaking with the designer, this can be as difficult as analysing Art. Anyone can go to the manufacturer's site, and reiterate the marketing info, I try to be more creative. Explaining in detail, what is going on. I wonder if I could have made an effort to discover who designed this block, and speak with that person? Regardless, I'll read through this thread several times, and internalize what I've read.
Yes the Galileo comment was overly dramatic, and I really don't feel that persecuted. One likes attention, but not necessarily this type of attention. I truly put a lot of effort into explaining how the block worked, and why it performed the way it did. I definately need better tools, and will aquire them ASAP. As I honestly stated, without a budget to speak of, I'm at the mercy of donations from stores/manufacturers.
Finally I'd like to apologize for responding with hositility, after accusing others of being hostile. I hope you'll see the improvement in my next article.
I will definately take your advice and read through some reviews here, as a beginner, I do want to improve my writing skills. I do know one must be well read, to write well. Hey the latter half of that statement is original, hehe.
