Wow, that was pretty powerful, but still you cannot blame writing style on unfortunate life experiences. You are not the only person who has suffered in their life. I used to be an avid MTB racer, play many sports, ect. That was until I was hit by a car, shattering my leg, messing up my face(it hit the mirror, which folded back. If I was 2 inches closer it would have killed me instantly), breaking my hand, and essentially ruining an entire year of my life (hey, got me into computers
). I have also lost parts of two of my fingers in another unfortunate incident involving a mini-blind cord. At one point, I missed three summers due to freak accidents occuring back-to-back. I am still only 18 years old, and that is what I have lived through thus far. I have no regrets, I have no ill feelings about how I have lived.
That being said, I have some useful information for you in writing your next article. When writing an article for the masses to read and learn from, it is important to write in a way that the masses can understand. Personally, I dont mind reading articles that contain vocabulary beyond my comprehension. I actually did not find your article difficult to understand, but I am somewhat concerned about your style because many people in this world are functionally illiterate. They want to look at the pictures, look at the graphs, and see what the writer has to say about the product and make a decision about it themselves. They don't want to crack open a dictionary to decipher the word "extrapolate" when a more widely used term like "determined" could be utilized. Just imagine the disasterous effects of using the word "tarry" on a stop sign. Likewise, you wouldn't want to see a list of things like "Cut the left side with a knife, use the bigges scissors to cut the little red bean thing on the left" on a Surgeon's notepad who is about to do a kidney extraction. You must understand that 90% of the people reading your article cannot understand the level of diction you enjoy using. I could write an article in a mix of German and English, for instance, and only a handful of people would understand it. The rest would probably make fun of it.
Sure, you don't have the proper test equipment to do a scientific analysis of each type of nozzle, but you can still use scientific methodologies to achieve repeatable, accurate, and acceptable results. One thing that could have been done is test all of the nozzles in relation to the #5 nozzle. Another thing would be reseating the waterblock on the core several times and find the lowest temp possible. This is necessary for AMD Blocks because of how small the core is, and because you are using the P4 with the IHS removed, the same should be done. Research could have been done to calculate the C/W of each nozzle, the flow rates of each, and the restriction of each. Important steps must be taken to ensure the believability of a review. I would not trust a review of a heatsink from a 13 year old who just comments on the asthetics of the thing half the time and then determines that it makes his computer run at only 35C. There are always more variables to control, and always others that need to be varied to make the article as complete as possible.
Don't let this negative feedback from many forums deter you from making more reviews, just be sure to consider who will be reading the article and the accuracy of the testing next time.
Good luck!