Okay, I think I was wrong about JoeC's number of mounts.
He still has some somewhat strange data though.
Quote:
|
From a statistical standpoint, throwing out all mounts other than the best one is a bad idea. A medium to large sample and a mean + std dev is much more logical. We have different goals though; you want to see maximum possible performance from a block and I want to see minimum chance I am wrong about recommendations
|
Oh, I totally understand your position and I by and large agree with it for purposes of writing a review for the common purchaser. It's just not ideal when trying to separate out design performance from "typical mount" performance.
We're striving for two different goals. For me, looking at the best results with each block is more interesting to my eye.