Quote:
|
Originally Posted by WAJ_UK
I was just working out the reynolds number for cascade couldn't figure out why I was getting such a huge number. I forgot to change jet diameter to metres. I made it 1020.22598  |
Yeah. It's a little gnarly. There were some minor differences between different revisions of the Cascade. The one tested at WCP, being from the first batch at 0.5GPM (1.88LPM) would have had an Re down around 850 or so. For the second batch, Re would be around 900. For the 3rd/4th batches, up around 950. For the SS, up over 1000. This reflects the fine tuning of the production process over time to allow for tighter tolerances.