[superart]

Originally Posted by *GBG*uggbash

Since, what mr Bill and Joe does to their bodies affects my children and their stepchildrens survivial chances on this planet i do care, despite libertarianism.

So your saying that if Mr. Bill or Mr. Joe smoke in the privacy of their own home, this will somehow effect your children? How would this effect anyone other than Mr. Bill or Mr. Joe?

Originally Posted by *GBG*uggbash

there is also a ton of sober reasoning based on science that proves it sucks...that has to have some effect, i wouldent gamble otherwise even if one thousands of studies proved otherwise...

You do realize that these two statements are entirely contradictory, right?




here are a couple studies that show that marijuana is not as harmful as you and others make it out to be. In fact, in many instances, it can be used to treat many illnesses and diseases. The current laws, however, are keeping it from being used to help countless people. I think this is potentially more harmful to your kids than if Mr. Joe or Mr. Bill choose to smoke.

http://my.webmd.com/content/article/74/89068.htm?lastselectedguid={5FE84E90-BC77-4056-A91C-9531713CA348}
http://my.webmd.com/content/article/23/1728_57309.htm?lastselectedguid={5FE84E90-BC77-4056-A91C-9531713CA348}
http://my.webmd.com/content/article/70/80972.htm?lastselectedguid={5F

Please point me to the “tons” of studies you mentioned that suggest that marijuana is so harmful to individuals and society, that we should impose tyrannical laws on people that are more harmful than the substance itself.

Originally Posted by *GBG*uggbash

THC are stored in the brain fat, now that has to have some effect, i wouldent gamble otherwise

glucose, sodium, and proteins are also fat soluble and are stored in the brain. Are you suggesting we pass laws against candy, eggs, and steak, just because “sober reasoning based on science” suggests that it also “sucks”?