Ben
when you describe a point on a curve as a limit you will be questioned - and found foolish
and when you persist in defending YOUR value judgments against more accurate descriptions, . . . .
a point on a curve is just that, why not call it such ?
(because then you could not sound like an authority spouting 1.5 or 1.3 or 1.8 infinitum ad nausium ?)
this is the same old re-state and re-phrase stuff you used to do (and I guess wish to continue doing)
no | limits | Ben, just associated incrementally higher 'costs'
|