Quote:
|
Originally Posted by unregistered
if you really want thah much heat moved you can run flat out -> better have a good cooling system though
|
It shouldn't be putting out that much more than a 226W pelt, ~10-15W more. It should give me a good idea of what I'd need to do if I stepped up to a 172+W pelt in the future. My main concern is not the CPU pelt, it's the GPU pelt running off the same rail as harddrives and cd-r/w drives. Most of the pelt systems I've seen have used seperate psu's. Even my oldschool days of cele-300a pelt cooling was always with a seperate psu. I was just wondering if getting a psu with a seperate rail would help me or not. If there's no noticable noice introduced I could possibly save a few bucks on the psu. Anyways, thanks for the reply.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KnightElite
I would recommend something beefier than a 120W TEC for your CPU....
|
I understand that most pelts used to cool cpu's these days are 172+W, but I've got the 120W and the psu. I might not get stellar temps, but it'd be better than just using straight watercooling, granted that I have adequate cooling for the setup to begin with.