View Single Post
Unread 04-30-2004, 02:27 PM   #49
rogerdugans
Cooling Neophyte
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 10
Default

rofl
I have been slammed in the past and always learned something from it.
Sometimes it has been proven to ven ME that I am wrong.
Other times I have only had my beliefs reinforced.

Quote:
Will it do as well as a block with a c/w of .13? Not likely as long as all other system variables are unchanged....but even then I would have to say it IS possible.
I made that statement for two reasons:
1) my own belief that a lower c/w will result in better cooling
2) reports that I have seen showing that a low-flow optimized block with a worse c/w can perform better than a high-flow optimized block WHEN BOTH ARE USED IN A SYSTEM WITH LOW FLOW.

I have NOT personally tested this...or anything else with great accuracy. I have neither the equipment, education or money to test all the things I would like.

What I do know are two things:
I have some knowledge of water cooling, but I know far from everything. I am a hobbyist, not a scientist.
This thread is now digressing from its original intent.

Call me what you will, but please start a new thread rather than thread-jacking this one.
rogerdugans is offline   Reply With Quote