Quote:
|
Originally Posted by unregistered
I would hope to hell its a new graph, lol (or someone can pull stuff from my computer)
the RBX does well ? - perhaps, depends on the pump capacity though (and sys design)
|
well it appears to beat everything, even the cascade, from a relatively attainable 0.5M headloss (a little over 1gpm i believe, since that is 16.3" H20 according to joe's test at overclockers) which certainly doesn't require anything exceptional in the pump line.... and certainly isn't what i'd have expected from pHaestus' tests....
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by unregistered
MCW5003g ?? come on now, think a bit . . . .
betcha Cathar can say exactly what it is
but compare it to the MCW6000, why would we mfgr it ?
|
think?? i'll try but it is nearly 2am over here....
presumably it's a further developement of the 5000>5002 line..... i can't think of what the "g" might be for though....
it appears to outperform the 6000 at all headlosses above 0.25M, which would seem to include
any system with an mcp600 - so on that basis (not knowing what it is) i presume that the mcw6000 is a lot cheaper to make...
hmm - it just occured to me... you do have the key right on this graph???