View Single Post
Unread 05-03-2004, 05:02 PM   #18
BillA
CoolingWorks Tech Guy
Formerly "Unregistered"
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
Default

Cathar
I believe you are doing your acolytes a dis-service by catering to their desire for (over)simplification
- that you (and I too, eh ?) use a simplification is of little import so long as the degree and extent of such is understood
-> that 'science' be also described so is quite harmful as those that do not understand are going to be beguiled into thinking that they do

please review the above thread,
h is never accurately defined, and the ENTIRE 'discussion' is a sham
(all wb calcs of "h" are pure bs; the "h" of the areas of significance are completely hidden within the overall average values calc)

WAJ_UK
Electronics Cooling had an article on the 45° assumption
BillA is offline   Reply With Quote