[Liquid3D]

I agree my reviewing techniques have a long way to go. My references to the Cascade are compliment, as it's considered the standard by which most others are judged. Objectivity is almost impossible to acheive, as we are subjective by nature. Just as you may be unconsciously biased towards Stew, I never purported to performing the review under laboratory conditions. So long as I describe the envrionmental conditions, which I'm testing under then I'm not misleading anyone. My comparisons's between the Casacde design and the CF1 design are hypothetical, and therefore by definition conjecture.

Often Reviewer's go into a review with bias, and rely on the data to prove or disprove any conjectture. But what seperates sterility, from an engaging read is often the reviewer's opinion.

In so far as the hardware being on the floor, the height of the test bench is about as relative as the difference in ambeint temperature between one laboratory to the next.

Thank you for the constructive criticsm. I've been writing manufacturers in attempt to find the proper test hardware. I would be very grateful for any donations, or further suggestions. However, so long as this is a free country, I'm going to continue to write.